These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29401059)

  • 21. Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.
    Sabin AT; Van Tasell DJ; Rabinowitz B; Dhar S
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216519900589. PubMed ID: 32003285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hearing aids in the real world: use of multimemory and volume controls.
    Banerjee S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):359-74. PubMed ID: 21864473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing Care Providers' Perspectives on the Utility of Datalogging Information.
    Saunders GH; Bott A; Tietz LHB
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Sep; 29(3S):610-622. PubMed ID: 32946254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.
    Chung K
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(3):83-124. PubMed ID: 15678225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fitting bone conduction hearing devices to children: audiological practices and challenges.
    Gordey D; Bagatto M
    Int J Audiol; 2021 May; 60(5):385-392. PubMed ID: 32930012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chapter 3: Setting the Hearing Aid Response and Verifying Signal Processing and Features in the Test Box.
    Palmer C; Zitelli L
    Semin Hear; 2024 May; 45(2):172-204. PubMed ID: 38855347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technology-limited and patient-derived versus audibility-derived fittings in bone-anchored hearing aid users: a validation study.
    Hodgetts WE; Hagler P; Hakansson BE; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 20829698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the Self-Fitting Process with a Commercially Available Hearing Aid.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; McLelland M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):109-118. PubMed ID: 28240978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Fischer RL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):628-46. PubMed ID: 27564441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Questionnaire Survey of Current Rehabilitation Practices for Adults With Normal Hearing Sensitivity Who Experience Auditory Difficulties.
    Koerner TK; A Papesh M; Gallun FJ
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):738-761. PubMed ID: 32966118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing aid outcomes: effects of gender and experience on patients' use and satisfaction.
    Williams VA; Johnson CE; Danhauer JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):422-32; quiz 459-60. PubMed ID: 19928396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consensus on Hearing Aid Candidature and Fitting for Mild Hearing Loss, With and Without Tinnitus: Delphi Review.
    Sereda M; Hoare DJ; Nicholson R; Smith S; Hall DA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):417-29. PubMed ID: 25587668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [New aspects of hearing aid fitting in noise-induced hearing loss].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 2006 Jul; 54(7):573-82; quiz 582. PubMed ID: 16741724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survey of hearing aid fitting practices for children with multiple impairments.
    Tharpe AM; Fino-Szumski MS; Bess FH
    Am J Audiol; 2001 Jun; 10(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11501895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Caring for musicians' ears: insights from audiologists and manufacturers reveal need for evidence-based guidelines.
    McGinnity S; Beach EF; Mulder J; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S12-S19. PubMed ID: 29192525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.