These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29401060)

  • 1. Exponential Modeling of Frequency-Following Responses in American Neonates and Adults.
    Jeng FC; Nance B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Lin CD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 29401060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exponential modeling of human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Chung HK; Lin CD; Dickman B; Hu J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):582-93. PubMed ID: 21722020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of an automated procedure for detecting frequency-following responses in American and Chinese neonates.
    Jeng FC; Peris KS; Hu J; Lin CD
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Apr; 116(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 24032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early maturation of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in infants with normal hearing.
    Jeng FC; Schnabel EA; Dickman BM; Hu J; Li X; Lin CD; Chung HK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Dec; 111(3):765-84. PubMed ID: 21319616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-negative matrix factorization improves the efficiency of recording frequency-following responses in normal-hearing adults and neonates.
    Jeng FC; Lin TH; Hart BN; Montgomery-Reagan K; McDonald K
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):688-698. PubMed ID: 35522832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing native language neural commitment at the brainstem level: A cross-linguistic investigation of the association between frequency-following response and speech perception.
    Yu L; Zhang Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():140-148. PubMed ID: 29246484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.
    Llanos F; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Nov; 291():101-112. PubMed ID: 28807860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A; Suresh CH; Gandour JT
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch perception and frequency-following responses elicited by lexical-tone chimeras.
    Jeng FC; Lin CD; Sabol JT; Hollister GR; Chou MS; Chen CH; Kenny JE; Tsou YA
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 26305289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative power of harmonics in human frequency-following responses associated with voice pitch in American and Chinese adults.
    Jeng FC; Costilow CE; Stangherlin DP; Lin CD
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 21987910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.
    Krishnan A; Xu Y; Gandour J; Cariani P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 15935624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left hemisphere lateralization for lexical and acoustic pitch processing in Cantonese speakers as revealed by mismatch negativity.
    Gu F; Zhang C; Hu A; Zhao G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():637-45. PubMed ID: 23856710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G; Powers L
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recording frequency-following responses to voice pitch in guinea pigs: preliminary results.
    Chou MS; Lin CD; Wang TC; Jeng FC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Jun; 118(3):681-90. PubMed ID: 25068740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language.
    Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.
    Krishnan A; Swaminathan J; Gandour JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1092-105. PubMed ID: 18702588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deficient neural encoding of speech sounds in term neonates born after fetal growth restriction.
    Ribas-Prats T; Arenillas-Alcón S; Lip-Sosa DL; Costa-Faidella J; Mazarico E; Gómez-Roig MD; Escera C
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13189. PubMed ID: 34758093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human frequency-following response: representation of tonal sweeps.
    Krishnan A; Parkinson J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 11025331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.