BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29401063)

  • 1. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Recorded Brainstem versus Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Speech.
    Bidelman GM; Pousson M; Dugas C; Fehrenbach A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):164-174. PubMed ID: 29401063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Vander Werff KR; Rieger B
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e200-e214. PubMed ID: 28319479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
    Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial hearing processing: electrophysiological documentation at subcortical and cortical levels.
    Rouhbakhsh N; Mahdi J; Hwo J; Nobel B; Mousave F
    Int J Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 129(11):1119-1132. PubMed ID: 31232638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response.
    Song JH; Nicol T; Kraus N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Feb; 122(2):346-55. PubMed ID: 20719558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.
    Hornickel J; Knowles E; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):52-8. PubMed ID: 22197852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of speech-evoked auditory brainstem response in healthy children at a low sensation level.
    Zakaria MN; Jalaei B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():28-31. PubMed ID: 29106871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging effects on the neural representation and perception of consonant transition cues.
    Poe AA; Karawani H; Anderson S
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109034. PubMed ID: 38781768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Early- and Late-Arriving Room Reflections on the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.
    Al Osman R; Giguère C; Dajani HR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 29401057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure.
    Prendergast G; Tu W; Guest H; Millman RE; Kluk K; Couth S; Munro KJ; Plack CJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():38-47. PubMed ID: 29685616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recording the human brainstem frequency-following-response in the free-field.
    Gama N; Peretz I; Lehmann A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Mar; 280():47-53. PubMed ID: 28185890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective Comparison of the Quality and Reliability of Auditory Brainstem Response Features Elicited by Click and Speech Sounds.
    Novis K; Bell S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 30142101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topographic recordings of auditory evoked potentials to speech: subcortical and cortical responses.
    Bellier L; Bouchet P; Jeanvoine A; Valentin O; Thai-Van H; Caclin A
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Apr; 52(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 25329609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Spectral Shaping on Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses to Stop Consonant-Vowel Syllables.
    Rishiq D; Harkrider A; Springer C; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):232-243. PubMed ID: 35130577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes in the subcortical-cortical encoding and categorical perception of speech.
    Bidelman GM; Villafuerte JW; Moreno S; Alain C
    Neurobiol Aging; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2526-2540. PubMed ID: 24908166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.