254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29402206)
1. Validation of Digital Microscopy Compared With Light Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Canine Cutaneous Tumors.
Bertram CA; Gurtner C; Dettwiler M; Kershaw O; Dietert K; Pieper L; Pischon H; Gruber AD; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2018 Jul; 55(4):490-500. PubMed ID: 29402206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Validation of a Whole-Slide Imaging Scanner in Cytological Samples: Diagnostic Accuracy and Comparison With Light Microscopy.
Bonsembiante F; Bonfanti U; Cian F; Cavicchioli L; Zattoni B; Gelain ME
Vet Pathol; 2019 May; 56(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 30686128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.
Hanna MG; Monaco SE; Cuda J; Xing J; Ahmed I; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):701-709. PubMed ID: 28558124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytomorphological description and intra-observer agreement in whole slide imaging for canine lymphoma.
Bonsembiante F; Martini V; Bonfanti U; Casarin G; Trez D; Gelain ME
Vet J; 2018 Jun; 236():96-101. PubMed ID: 29871757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital vs traditional: Are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting?
Ross J; Greaves J; Earls P; Shulruf B; Van Es SL
Cytopathology; 2018 Aug; 29(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 29665117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology.
Campbell WS; Lele SM; West WW; Lazenby AJ; Smith LM; Hinrichs SH
Hum Pathol; 2012 Oct; 43(10):1739-44. PubMed ID: 22591912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated diagnosis of 7 canine skin tumors using machine learning on H&E-stained whole slide images.
Fragoso-Garcia M; Wilm F; Bertram CA; Merz S; Schmidt A; Donovan T; Fuchs-Baumgartinger A; Bartel A; Marzahl C; Diehl L; Puget C; Maier A; Aubreville M; Breininger K; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2023 Nov; 60(6):865-875. PubMed ID: 37515411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital reporting of whole-slide images is safe and suitable for assessing organ quality in preimplantation renal biopsies.
Eccher A; Neil D; Ciangherotti A; Cima L; Boschiero L; Martignoni G; Ghimenton C; Chilosi M; Giobelli L; Zampicinini L; Casartelli M; Brunelli M
Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26547252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Applications and challenges of digital pathology and whole slide imaging.
Higgins C
Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25978139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.
Kent MN; Olsen TG; Feeser TA; Tesno KC; Moad JC; Conroy MP; Kendrick MJ; Stephenson SR; Murchland MR; Khan AU; Peacock EA; Brumfiel A; Bottomley MA
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 153(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 29049424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Region of Interest Digital Cytology Compared to Light Microscopy for Veterinary Medicine.
Blanchet CJK; Fish EJ; Miller AG; Snyder LA; Labadie JD; Avery PR
Vet Pathol; 2019 Sep; 56(5):725-731. PubMed ID: 31113293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of a whole-slide image-based teleconsultation network.
Baidoshvili A; Stathonikos N; Freling G; Bart J; 't Hart N; van der Laak J; Doff J; van der Vegt B; Kluin PM; van Diest PJ
Histopathology; 2018 Nov; 73(5):777-783. PubMed ID: 29893996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a digital pathology system including remote review during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hanna MG; Reuter VE; Ardon O; Kim D; Sirintrapun SJ; Schüffler PJ; Busam KJ; Sauter JL; Brogi E; Tan LK; Xu B; Bale T; Agaram NP; Tang LH; Ellenson LH; Philip J; Corsale L; Stamelos E; Friedlander MA; Ntiamoah P; Labasin M; England C; Klimstra DS; Hameed M
Mod Pathol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):2115-2127. PubMed ID: 32572154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.
Krupinski EA; Tillack AA; Richter L; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Graham AR; Descour MR; Davis JR; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1543-56. PubMed ID: 17129792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Pathologist 2.0: An Update on Digital Pathology in Veterinary Medicine.
Bertram CA; Klopfleisch R
Vet Pathol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):756-766. PubMed ID: 28578626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computerized training and proficiency testing. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Vooijs GP; Davey DD; Somrak TM; Goodell RM; Grohs DH; Knesel EA; Mango LJ; Mui KK; Nielsen ML; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 9479333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of colon biopsies using virtual microscopy is reliable.
van der Post RS; van der Laak JA; Sturm B; Clarijs R; Schaafsma HE; van Krieken JH; Nap M
Histopathology; 2013 Jul; 63(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 23692065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
