BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29402236)

  • 1. Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hwang YS; Tsai HY; Lin YY; Lui KW
    BMC Med Imaging; 2018 Feb; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 29402236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure of abdominal cone beam computed tomography.
    Sailer AM; Schurink GW; Wildberger JE; de Graaf R; van Zwam WH; de Haan MW; Kemerink GJ; Jeukens CR
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Feb; 38(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 24798137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation Exposure During Transarterial Chemoembolization: Angio-CT Versus Cone-Beam CT.
    Piron L; Le Roy J; Cassinotto C; Delicque J; Belgour A; Allimant C; Beregi JP; Greffier J; Molinari N; Guiu B
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1609-1618. PubMed ID: 31222382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation exposure during TACE procedures using additional cone-beam CT (CBCT) for guidance: safety and precautions.
    Jonczyk M; Collettini F; Geisel D; Schnapauff D; Böning G; Wieners G; Gebauer G
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 29490465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of patient effective dose of neurovascular imaging protocols for C-arm cone-beam CT.
    Wang C; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Jiang X; Ferrell A; Smith T; Yoshizumi T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):1072-7. PubMed ID: 24758663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective patient dose during neuroradiological C-arm CT procedures.
    Bai M; Liu X; Liu B
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 23266966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organ doses and normalized organ doses for various age groups in ultralow dose pediatric C-arm cone-beam CT.
    Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5790-5798. PubMed ID: 35364713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of coefficients to derive organ and effective doses from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans: a Monte Carlo study.
    Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 29154259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of Latest-generation Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Post Lipiodol-embolization Imaging in Hepatic Transarterial Chemoembolization in Comparison with Multi-detector Computed Tomography.
    Alizadeh LS; Koch V; Vogl TJ; Yel I; Gruenewald L; Albrecht MH; Herrmann E; von Knebel-Doeberitz PL; Booz C
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):e109-e118. PubMed ID: 34598867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Effective Doses During Image-Guided Core Needle Biopsies with Computed Tomography Versus C-Arm Cone Beam CT Using Adult and Pediatric Phantoms.
    Ben-Shlomo A; Cohen D; Bruckheimer E; Bachar GN; Konstantinovsky R; Birk E; Atar E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 May; 39(5):732-739. PubMed ID: 26493824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodality 3D Tumor Segmentation in HCC Patients Treated with TACE.
    Wang Z; Chapiro J; Schernthaner R; Duran R; Chen R; Geschwind JF; Lin M
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):840-5. PubMed ID: 25863795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive Monte Carlo study of patient doses from cone-beam CT imaging in radiotherapy.
    Marchant TE; Joshi KD
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 27922831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
    Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new angiographic imaging platform reduces radiation exposure for patients with liver cancer treated with transarterial chemoembolization.
    Schernthaner RE; Duran R; Chapiro J; Wang Z; Geschwind JF; Lin M
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3255-62. PubMed ID: 25956933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: No increase in effective dose from half compared to full rotation pelvis cone beam CT.
    Hauri P; Hälg RA; Schneider U
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):364-368. PubMed ID: 28766828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SU-D-217BCD-06: Evaluation of Effective Dose during Neuro 3-D Imaging Using a C-Arm Cone-Beam CT System.
    Wang C; Ferrell A; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Jiang X; Haynes W; Enterline D; Smith T; Yoshizumi T
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3620. PubMed ID: 28517429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-Man adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy.
    Gu J; Bednarz B; Xu XG; Jiang SB
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 18667400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients.
    Yeh JK; Chen CH
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):131. PubMed ID: 30075771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
    Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.