269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29402321)
1. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.
Emmert M; Meszmer N; Schlesinger M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 29402321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Are Facebook Ratings Associated with Hospital Quality and Patient Satisfaction? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Obstetrics Care in German Hospitals].
Emmert M; Becker S; Meszmer N; Sander U
Gesundheitswesen; 2020 Jun; 82(6):541-547. PubMed ID: 30477038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associations between Internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study.
Greaves F; Pape UJ; King D; Darzi A; Majeed A; Wachter RM; Millett C
BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Jul; 21(7):600-5. PubMed ID: 22523318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State.
Campbell L; Li Y
BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Feb; 27(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 28600452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Intensified Supervision by Health Care Inspectorates on Online Patient Ratings of Hospitals: A Multilevel Study of More Than 43,000 Online Ratings.
Kool RB; Kleefstra SM; Borghans I; Atsma F; van de Belt TH
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e198. PubMed ID: 27421302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
McLennan S
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hospital Quality Reporting in the United States: Does Report Card Design and Incorporation of Patient Narrative Comments Affect Hospital Choice?
Emmert M; Schlesinger M
Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 52(3):933-958. PubMed ID: 27324087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance Measures.
Kanouse DE; Schlesinger M; Shaller D; Martino SC; Rybowski L
Med Care; 2016 Jan; 54(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 26551765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States.
Lagu T; Goff SL; Hannon NS; Shatz A; Lindenauer PK
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2013 Jan; 39(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23367647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.
Chua JT; Nguyen E; Risbud A; Soltanzadeh-Zarandi S; Lee A; Jamshidi S; Bayginejad S; Abouzari M
Laryngoscope; 2021 Oct; 131(10):2356-2360. PubMed ID: 33625763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.
Bardach NS; Hibbard JH; Greaves F; Dudley RA
J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e102. PubMed ID: 25934100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of HCAHPS Specific Care Experiences to Global Ratings Varies Across 7 Countries: What Can be Learned for Reporting These Global Ratings?
Orindi BO; Lesaffre E; Quintero A; Sermeus W; Bruyneel L
Med Care; 2019 Nov; 57(11):e65-e72. PubMed ID: 30807453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
