236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29402490)
1. In the Setting of Negative Mammogram, Is Additional Breast Ultrasound Necessary for Evaluation of Breast Pain?
Mema E; Cho E; Ryu YK; Jadeja P; Wynn R; Taback B; Ha R
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(2):117-120. PubMed ID: 29402490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focal breast pain: imaging evaluation and outcomes.
Owen WA; Brazeal HA; Shaw HL; Lee MV; Appleton CM; Holley SO
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():148-155. PubMed ID: 30825809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?
Leung SE; Ben-Nachum I; Kornecki A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):200-4. PubMed ID: 27081707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications.
Loving VA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Gutierrez RL; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1472-7. PubMed ID: 21098212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Palpable breast abnormalities in women under age 40.
Lee MV; Shaw HL; Chi T; Brazeal HA; Holley SO; Appleton CM
Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 29687544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Imaging Outcomes following Abnormal Thermography.
Neal CH; Flynt KA; Jeffries DO; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 29275941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overutilization of Health Care Resources for Breast Pain.
Kushwaha AC; Shin K; Kalambo M; Legha R; Gerlach KE; Kapoor MM; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 29792736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated.
Noroozian M; Stein LF; Gaetke-Udager K; Helvie MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jan; 149(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 25556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF): benign breast tumors - short text.
Lavoué V; Fritel X; Antoine M; Beltjens F; Bendifallah S; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boulanger L; Canlorbe G; Catteau-Jonard S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Chamming's F; Chéreau E; Chopier J; Coutant C; Demetz J; Guilhen N; Fauvet R; Kerdraon O; Laas E; Legendre G; Mathelin C; Nadeau C; Naggara IT; Ngô C; Ouldamer L; Rafii A; Roedlich MN; Seror J; Séror JY; Touboul C; Uzan C; Daraï E;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():16-23. PubMed ID: 26967341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.
Zanello PA; Robim AF; Oliveira TM; Elias Junior J; Andrade JM; Monteiro CR; Sarmento Filho JM; Carrara HH; Muglia VF
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 21552670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump.
Leddy R; Irshad A; Zerwas E; Mayes N; Armeson K; Abid M; Cluver A; Campbell A; Ackerman S; Lewis M
Breast J; 2013; 19(6):582-9. PubMed ID: 24011215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. To evaluate the role of sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts.
Masroor I; Ahmed MN; Pasha S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 May; 59(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 19438134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
