212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29402796)
1. Oral Brush Liquid-Based Cytology: A Study of Concordance between a Cytotechnologist and a Cytopathologist.
Pandey P; Agarwal S; Ralli M; Dixit A; Singh D
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(2):121-129. PubMed ID: 29402796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, blinded comparison of cytology and DNA-image cytometry of brush biopsies for early detection of oral malignancy.
Kämmerer PW; Koch FP; Santoro M; Babaryka G; Biesterfeld S; Brieger J; Kunkel M
Oral Oncol; 2013 May; 49(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 23318121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of cytotechnologist evaluation of specimen adequacy and screening interpretation of malignancy in fine-needle aspiration of the liver.
Ahmed A; Novak AB; Farhat Sheerin A; Boonyaarunnate T; Ali SZ; Olson MT
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25115188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of toluidine blue staining and brush cytology as adjuncts in clinical examination of suspicious oral mucosal lesions.
Güneri P; Epstein JB; Kaya A; Veral A; Kazandı A; Boyacioglu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 21112183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of oral cancer cytology in a pilot study.
Sekine J; Nakatani E; Hideshima K; Iwahashi T; Sasaki H
Diagn Pathol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):27. PubMed ID: 28298213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based oral brush cytology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using a modified Bethesda Cytology system.
Alsarraf A; Kujan O; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2018 Oct; 47(9):887-894. PubMed ID: 29957892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-computer-assisted liquid-based cytology for diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Pérez-Sayáns M; Reboiras-López MD; Gayoso-Diz P; Seijas-Naya F; Antúnez-López JR; Gándara-Rey JM; García-García A
Biotech Histochem; 2012 Jan; 87(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 21526909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic efficiency of differentiating small cancerous and precancerous lesions using mucosal brush smears of the oral cavity--a prospective and blinded study.
Koch FP; Kunkel M; Biesterfeld S; Wagner W
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):763-9. PubMed ID: 20593209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of oral brush cytology cell block immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Kujan O; Idrees M; Anand N; Soh B; Wong E; Farah CS
J Oral Pathol Med; 2021 May; 50(5):451-458. PubMed ID: 33368584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients.
Mehrotra R; Singh MK; Pandya S; Singh M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18644521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The malignant transformation of leukoplakia of the oral cavity. A review of the literature and clinical case reports].
Colella G; De Luca F; Lanza A; Tartaro GP
Minerva Stomatol; 1995 Jun; 44(6):291-300. PubMed ID: 7476784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of oral brush biopsy in potentially malignant disorder management.
Goodson ML; Smith DR; Thomson PJ
J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Nov; 46(10):896-901. PubMed ID: 28833675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of spatula and cytobrush cytological techniques in early detection of oral malignant and premalignant lesions: a prospective and blinded study.
Nanayakkara PG; Dissanayaka WL; Nanayakkara BG; Amaratunga EA; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Apr; 45(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 26403502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions.
Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiological and clinicopathological study of oral leukoplakia.
Mishra M; Mohanty J; Sengupta S; Tripathy S
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2005; 71(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 16394403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of brush cytology and DNA image cytometry for the detection of cancer of the oral cavity.
Kaur M; Handa U; Mohan H; Dass A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Mar; 44(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 26739314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Noninvasive brush biopsy as an innovative tool for early detection of oral carcinomas].
Remmerbach TW; Mathes SN; Weidenbach H; Hemprich A; Böcking A
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 15293118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical manifestations of oral precancer and cancer.
Raubenheimer EJ; de Villiers PI
S Afr Med J; 1989 Feb; Suppl():11-4. PubMed ID: 2916168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Room for improvement: initial experience with anal cytology: observations from the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in nongynecologic cytology.
Darragh TM; Winkler B; Souers RJ; Laucirica R; Zhao C; Moriarty AT;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1550-4. PubMed ID: 24168493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
