These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2940280)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of three anterior restorative resins at 3 years.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 2940280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term deterioration of composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(6):202-9. PubMed ID: 1840079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of an air-powder abrasive instrument on composite resin.
    Cooley RL; Lubow RM; Patrissi GA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Mar; 112(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 2937824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year assessment of anterior resin restorations inserted with two acid-etch restorative procedures.
    Qvist V; Ström C; Thylstrup A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Aug; 93(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 3898343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of four anterior composite resins over five years.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jul; 8(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1291392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Apr; 37(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 1534986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of enamel-bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin.
    Smales RJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 1830747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years.
    Smales RJ; Gerke DC
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 1290611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal leakage of a microfilled composite resin.
    Hembree JH
    Ark Dent J; 1982 Sep; 53(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 6218797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical comparison of three tooth-colored restorative resins.
    Davis RD; Mayhew RB; Voss JE
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(5):9-12. PubMed ID: 6219164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites.
    Lundin SA; Andersson B; Koch G; Rasmusson CG
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 2255989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.