These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29404733)
1. A model for predicting the GEARS score from virtual reality surgical simulator metrics. Dubin AK; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P; Smith R Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3576-3581. PubMed ID: 29404733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools. Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery. Moglia A; Ferrari V; Morelli L; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Cuschieri A Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 26433570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Randomized Comparison of 2 Robotic Virtual Reality Simulators and Evaluation of Trainees' Skills Transfer to a Simulated Robotic Urethrovesical Anastomosis Task. Hoogenes J; Wong N; Al-Harbi B; Kim KS; Vij S; Bolognone E; Quantz M; Guo Y; Shayegan B; Matsumoto ED Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():110-115. PubMed ID: 29054720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of robotic simulated skills tasks is positively associated with clinical robotic surgical performance. Aghazadeh MA; Mercado MA; Pan MM; Miles BJ; Goh AC BJU Int; 2016 Sep; 118(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 27104883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool. Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative analysis and guide to virtual reality robotic surgical simulators. Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P; Truong M; Perez M; Smith R Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29125206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are basic robotic surgical skills transferable from the simulator to the operating room? A randomized, prospective, educational study. Almarzouq A; Hu J; Noureldin YA; Yin A; Anidjar M; Bladou F; Tanguay S; Kassouf W; Aprikian AG; Andonian S Can Urol Assoc J; 2020 Dec; 14(12):416-422. PubMed ID: 32569567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Virtual-Reality Robotic Surgery Simulators. Hertz AM; George EI; Vaccaro CM; Brand TC JSLS; 2018; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 29618918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads. Lee GI; Lee MR Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28634632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. Foell K; Furse A; Honey RJ; Pace KT; Lee JY J Robot Surg; 2013 Dec; 7(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 27001876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. dV-Trainer vs. da Vinci Simulator: Comparison of Virtual Reality Platforms for Robotic Surgery. Ahmad SB; Rice M; Chang C; Zureikat AH; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME J Surg Res; 2021 Nov; 267():695-704. PubMed ID: 34348185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structured training on the da Vinci Skills Simulator leads to improvement in technical performance of robotic novices. Walliczek-Dworschak U; Mandapathil M; Förtsch A; Teymoortash A; Dworschak P; Werner JA; Güldner C Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 42(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 27133186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accelerated Skills Acquisition Protocol (ASAP) in optimizing robotic surgical simulation training: a prospective randomized study. Gurung PMS; Campbell T; Wang B; Joseph JV; Ghazi AE World J Urol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1623-1630. PubMed ID: 31256250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporation and validation of clinically relevant performance metrics of simulation (CRPMS) into a novel full-immersion simulation platform for nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (NS-RARP) utilizing three-dimensional printing and hydrogel casting technology. Witthaus MW; Farooq S; Melnyk R; Campbell T; Saba P; Mathews E; Ezzat B; Ertefaie A; Frye TP; Wu G; Rashid H; Joseph JV; Ghazi A BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):322-332. PubMed ID: 31677325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Training in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of training modalities and objective and subjective assessment methods. Rahimi AM; Uluç E; Hardon SF; Bonjer HJ; van der Peet DL; Daams F Surg Endosc; 2024 Jul; 38(7):3547-3555. PubMed ID: 38814347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]