BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29404753)

  • 1. Defining Early Recurrence of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-intent Surgery: A Multi-institutional Study from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium.
    Zhang XF; Beal EW; Chakedis J; Chen Q; Lv Y; Ethun CG; Salem A; Weber SM; Tran T; Poultsides G; Son AY; Hatzaras I; Jin L; Fields RC; Buettner S; Scoggins C; Martin RCG; Isom CA; Idrees K; Mogal HD; Shen P; Maithel SK; Schmidt CR; Pawlik TM
    World J Surg; 2018 Sep; 42(9):2919-2929. PubMed ID: 29404753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection: Should they be recognized as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or differentiated?
    Lu J; Li B; Li FY; Ye H; Xiong XZ; Cheng NS
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2173-2179. PubMed ID: 31208772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative and long-term outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus after curative-intent resection: comparison with peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    Zhang XF; Bagante F; Chen Q; Beal EW; Lv Y; Weiss M; Popescu I; Marques HP; Aldrighetti L; Maithel SK; Pulitano C; Bauer TW; Shen F; Poultsides GA; Soubrane O; Martel G; Koerkamp BG; Guglielmi A; Itaru E; Pawlik TM
    Surgery; 2018 May; 163(5):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 29398035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent.
    Zhang XF; Beal EW; Bagante F; Chakedis J; Weiss M; Popescu I; Marques HP; Aldrighetti L; Maithel SK; Pulitano C; Bauer TW; Shen F; Poultsides GA; Soubrane O; Martel G; Koerkamp BG; Itaru E; Pawlik TM
    Br J Surg; 2018 Jun; 105(7):848-856. PubMed ID: 29193010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic factors and long-term outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-institution experience in China.
    Hu HJ; Mao H; Shrestha A; Tan YQ; Ma WJ; Yang Q; Wang JK; Cheng NS; Li FY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 22(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26937148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Impact of Intraoperative Re-Resection of a Positive Bile Duct Margin on Clinical Outcomes for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Zhang XF; Squires MH; Bagante F; Ethun CG; Salem A; Weber SM; Tran T; Poultsides G; Son AY; Hatzaras I; Jin L; Fields RC; Weiss M; Scoggins C; Martin RCG; Isom CA; Idrees K; Mogal HD; Shen P; Maithel SK; Schmidt CR; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 25(5):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 29470820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recurrence after curative-intent resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of a large cohort with a close postoperative follow-up approach.
    Komaya K; Ebata T; Yokoyama Y; Igami T; Sugawara G; Mizuno T; Yamaguchi J; Nagino M
    Surgery; 2018 Apr; 163(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 29336813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of caudate lobe resection on margin status and outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium.
    Bhutiani N; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Ethun CG; Poultsides GA; Pawlik TM; Weber SM; Schmidt CR; Fields RC; Idrees K; Hatzaras I; Shen P; Maithel SK; Martin RCG
    Surgery; 2018 Apr; 163(4):726-731. PubMed ID: 29306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of microvascular invasion on clinical outcomes after curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Hu LS; Weiss M; Popescu I; Marques HP; Aldrighetti L; Maithel SK; Pulitano C; Bauer TW; Shen F; Poultsides GA; Soubrane O; Martel G; Koerkamp BG; Itaru E; Pawlik TM
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jan; 119(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 30466151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the bile duct margin in patients with surgically resected node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor survival: a retrospective study.
    Higuchi R; Yazawa T; Uemura S; Izumo W; Furukawa T; Yamamoto M
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2017 Aug; 24(8):456-465. PubMed ID: 28547855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of 18-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer.
    Ma KW; Cheung TT; She WH; Chok KSH; Chan ACY; Dai WC; Chiu WH; Lo CM
    World J Surg; 2018 Mar; 42(3):823-834. PubMed ID: 28905105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recurrence Patterns and Timing Courses Following Curative-Intent Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Hu LS; Zhang XF; Weiss M; Popescu I; Marques HP; Aldrighetti L; Maithel SK; Pulitano C; Bauer TW; Shen F; Poultsides GA; Soubrane O; Martel G; Koerkamp BG; Itaru E; Pawlik TM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 31020501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oncologic effects of preoperative biliary drainage in resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Percutaneous biliary drainage has no adverse effects on survival.
    Zhang XF; Beal EW; Merath K; Ethun CG; Salem A; Weber SM; Tran T; Poultsides G; Son AY; Hatzaras I; Jin L; Fields RC; Weiss M; Scoggins C; Martin RCG; Isom CA; Idrees K; Mogal HD; Shen P; Maithel SK; Schmidt CR; Pawlik TM
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 117(6):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 29205351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolution of surgery for Klatskin tumor demonstrates improved outcome: a single center analysis.
    Yan Y; Lu N; Tian W; Liu T
    Tumori; 2014; 100(6):e250-6. PubMed ID: 25688507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of initial disease recurrence after resection of gallbladder carcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma: implications for adjuvant therapeutic strategies.
    Jarnagin WR; Ruo L; Little SA; Klimstra D; D'Angelica M; DeMatteo RP; Wagman R; Blumgart LH; Fong Y
    Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(8):1689-700. PubMed ID: 14534886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive factors of early recurrence after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single institution experience in China.
    Hu HJ; Jin YW; Shrestha A; Ma WJ; Wang JK; Liu F; Zhu YY; Zhou RX; Regmi P; Cheng NS; Li FY
    Cancer Med; 2019 Apr; 8(4):1567-1575. PubMed ID: 30868740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specific risk factors contributing to early and late recurrences of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection.
    Wang C; Pang S; Si-Ma H; Yang N; Zhang H; Fu Y; Yang G
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 30606203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early recurrence of well-differentiated (G1) neuroendocrine liver metastasis after curative-intent surgery: Risk factors and outcome.
    Xiang JX; Zhang XF; Weiss M; Aldrighetti L; Poultsides GA; Bauer TW; Fields RC; Maithel SK; Marques HP; Pawlik TM
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1096-1104. PubMed ID: 30261105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The effect of prealbumin on the long-term prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma following radical surgery].
    Chen ZY; Liu ZP; Dai HS; Jiang Y; He Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 60(4):378-386. PubMed ID: 35272430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes after vascular resection during curative-intent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium.
    Schimizzi GV; Jin LX; Davidson JT; Krasnick BA; Ethun CG; Pawlik TM; Poultsides G; Tran T; Idrees K; Isom CA; Weber SM; Salem A; Hawkins WG; Strasberg SM; Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Martin RCG; Scoggins C; Shen P; Mogal HD; Schmidt C; Beal E; Hatzaras I; Shenoy R; Maithel SK; Fields RC
    HPB (Oxford); 2018 Apr; 20(4):332-339. PubMed ID: 29169904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.