BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29405481)

  • 1. Comparison of fungal fluorescent staining and ITS rDNA PCR-based sequencing with conventional methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis.
    Bao F; Fan Y; Sun L; Yu Y; Wang Z; Pan Q; Yu C; Liu H; Zhang F
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):1017-1021. PubMed ID: 29405481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of diagnostic methods for onychomycosis, and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm.
    Jung MY; Shim JH; Lee JH; Lee JH; Yang JM; Lee DY; Jang KT; Lee NY; Lee JH; Park JH; Park KK
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2015 Jul; 40(5):479-84. PubMed ID: 25683452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of PCR for the diagnosis of dermatophytes in nail specimens from patients with suspected onychomycosis.
    Luk NM; Hui M; Cheng TS; Tang LS; Ho KM
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2012 Apr; 37(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 22300052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA-based detection for onychomycosis correlates better to histopathology than does fungal culture.
    Gustafson E; Bakotic W; Bennett L; Page L; McCarthy L
    Dermatol Online J; 2019 Jul; 25(7):. PubMed ID: 31450272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of potassium hydroxide mount and mycological culture with histopathologic examination using periodic acid-Schiff staining of the nail clippings in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.
    Shenoy MM; Teerthanath S; Karnaker VK; Girisha BS; Krishna Prasad MS; Pinto J
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2008; 74(3):226-9. PubMed ID: 18583788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 18S rDNA polymerase chain reaction and sequencing in onychomycosis diagnostics.
    Walberg M; Mørk C; Sandven P; Jorde AT; Bjørås M; Gaustad P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2006; 86(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 16710579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Evaluation of a Novel Real-Time PCR for Pan-Dermatophyte Detection in Nail Specimens.
    Gong J; Ran M; Wang X; Wan Z; Li R
    Mycopathologia; 2016 Feb; 181(1-2):51-7. PubMed ID: 26412381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complementary role of a polymerase chain reaction test in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.
    Chandran NS; Pan JY; Pramono ZA; Tan HH; Seow CS
    Australas J Dermatol; 2013 May; 54(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 23425129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fast and sensitive detection of Trichophyton rubrum DNA from the nail samples of patients with onychomycosis by a double-round polymerase chain reaction-based assay.
    Gupta AK; Zaman M; Singh J
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):698-703. PubMed ID: 17714569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [DNA extraction and identification of Trichophyton rubrum by real-time polymerase chain reaction from direct nail scraping specimens of patients with onycomycosis].
    Berk E; Kuştimur S; Kalkancı A; Oztaş OM
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 21341169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular Diagnostic Techniques for Onychomycosis: Validity and Potential Application.
    Watanabe S; Ishida K
    Am J Clin Dermatol; 2017 Apr; 18(2):281-286. PubMed ID: 28160226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histopathological examination of nail clippings using PAS staining (HPE-PAS): gold standard in diagnosis of Onychomycosis.
    Jeelani S; Ahmed QM; Lanker AM; Hassan I; Jeelani N; Fazili T
    Mycoses; 2015 Jan; 58(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25346218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast and reliable PCR/sequencing/RFLP assay for identification of fungi in onychomycoses.
    Monod M; Bontems O; Zaugg C; Léchenne B; Fratti M; Panizzon R
    J Med Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 55(Pt 9):1211-1216. PubMed ID: 16914650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay for dermatophyte and nondermatophyte identification in onychomycosis.
    Bontems O; Hauser PM; Monod M
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Oct; 161(4):791-6. PubMed ID: 19558597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis.
    Weinberg JM; Koestenblatt EK; Tutrone WD; Tishler HR; Najarian L
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Aug; 49(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 12894064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a new commercial test, Dermatophyte-PCR kit, with conventional methods for rapid detection and identification of Trichophyton rubrum in nail specimens.
    Kondori N; Abrahamsson AL; Ataollahy N; Wennerås C
    Med Mycol; 2010 Nov; 48(7):1005-8. PubMed ID: 20370367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dermatophytosis: fluorostaining enhances speed and sensitivity in direct microscopy of skin, nail and hair specimens from dermatology outpatients.
    Ovrén E; Berglund L; Nordlind K; Rollman O
    Mycoses; 2016 Jul; 59(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 26931645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new fluorescent reagent, fluorescent brightener 85, for the diagnosis of suspected onychomycosis compared with potassium hydroxide.
    Yue X; Wang A; Wang H; Li Q; Yue X
    Mycoses; 2018 Apr; 61(4):279-282. PubMed ID: 29193377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histopathological diagnosis of onychomycosis by periodic acid-Schiff-stained nail clippings.
    Reisberger EM; Abels C; Landthaler M; Szeimies RM
    Br J Dermatol; 2003 Apr; 148(4):749-54. PubMed ID: 12752134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid real-time diagnostic PCR for Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes in patients with tinea unguium and tinea pedis using specific fluorescent probes.
    Miyajima Y; Satoh K; Uchida T; Yamada T; Abe M; Watanabe S; Makimura M; Makimura K
    J Dermatol Sci; 2013 Mar; 69(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 23287391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.