These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29405755)

  • 1. Dynamic Risk Assessment of Sexual Offenders: Validity and Dimensional Structure of the Stable-2007.
    Etzler S; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):822-839. PubMed ID: 29405755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic risk assessment in sexual offenders using STABLE-2000 and the STABLE-2007: an investigation of predictive and incremental validity.
    Eher R; Matthes A; Schilling F; Haubner-Maclean T; Rettenberger M
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):5-28. PubMed ID: 21537058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Actuarial risk assessment of sexual offenders: The psychometric properties of the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG).
    Rettenberger M; Rice ME; Harris GT; Eher R
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):624-638. PubMed ID: 28594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?
    Reeves SG; Ogloff JRP; Simmons M
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Dec; 30(8):887-907. PubMed ID: 28597720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Less Is More: Using Static-2002R Subscales to Predict Violent and General Recidivism Among Sexual Offenders.
    Babchishin KM; Hanson RK; Blais J
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Apr; 28(3):187-217. PubMed ID: 25667228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive and incremental validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and STABLE-2007 for sexual recidivism: A diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA).
    Holper L; Cerullo E; Mokros A; Habermeyer E
    Psychol Assess; 2024 Feb; 36(2):134-146. PubMed ID: 38059959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine Learning and Risk Assessment: Random Forest Does Not Outperform Logistic Regression in the Prediction of Sexual Recidivism.
    Etzler S; Schönbrodt FD; Pargent F; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):460-481. PubMed ID: 37039529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive accuracy of dynamic risk factors for aboriginal and non-aboriginal sex offenders: an exploratory comparison using STABLE-2007.
    Helmus L; Babchishin KM; Blais J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Sep; 56(6):856-76. PubMed ID: 21821602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three Central Dimensions of Sexual Recidivism Risk: Understanding the Latent Constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R.
    Brouillette-Alarie S; Proulx J; Hanson RK
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Sep; 30(6):676-704. PubMed ID: 28183223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field measures of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of recidivism among sexual offenders.
    Harris PB; Boccaccini MT; Rice AK
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):639-651. PubMed ID: 28594208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term predictive validity of the static-99 and static-99-R for indigenous and nonindigenous Australian sexual offenders.
    Smallbone S; Rallings M
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Jun; 25(3):302-16. PubMed ID: 23389506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does consideration of psychopathy and sexual deviance add to the predictive validity of the static-99R?
    Looman J; Morphett NA; Abracen J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Aug; 57(8):939-65. PubMed ID: 22641857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: a direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark.
    Bengtson S; Långström N
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 17534713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field validity of Static-99/R scores in a statewide sample of 34,687 convicted sexual offenders.
    Boccaccini MT; Rice AK; Helmus LM; Murrie DC; Harris PB
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):611-623. PubMed ID: 28594205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis.
    van den Berg JW; Smid W; Schepers K; Wever E; van Beek D; Janssen E; Gijs L
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 28368169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments.
    Smid WJ; Kamphuis JH; Wever EC; Van Beek DJ
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 24773035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.