These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29406262)

  • 1. Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Outcomes Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Landmarks-The Case for Apples and Oranges?
    Borba AM; José da Silva E; Fernandes da Silva AL; Han MD; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Miloro M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 76(8):1746-1752. PubMed ID: 29406262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of Mandible-First versus Maxilla-First Approach and of Thick versus Thin Splints for Skeletal Position after Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery.
    Borikanphanitphaisan T; Lin CH; Chen YA; Ko EW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):421-431. PubMed ID: 33235045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Many Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Does It Take to Perform Virtual Orthognathic Surgical Planning?
    Borba AM; Haupt D; de Almeida Romualdo LT; da Silva AL; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Miloro M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 74(9):1807-26. PubMed ID: 27080045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
    Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Accurate Is 3-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Planning for Segmental Maxillary Surgery?
    Kwon TG; Miloro M; Han MD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 78(9):1597-1608. PubMed ID: 32464103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Vertical Soft Tissue and Actual Bony Landmarks Correlate in Le Fort I Orthognathic Surgery?
    Tsay CJ; Sawh-Martinez R; Bruckman K; Veeramani A; Steinbacher D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 77(4):828-833. PubMed ID: 30576675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of maxillary positioning using digital model planning and 3D printed wafers in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Cousley RRJ; Bainbridge M; Rossouw PE
    J Orthod; 2017 Dec; 44(4):256-267. PubMed ID: 28980512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of three-dimensional virtual simulation of the soft tissues of the face in OrtogOnBlender for correction of class II dentofacial deformities: an uncontrolled experimental case-series study.
    Cunha HS; da Costa Moraes CA; de Faria Valle Dornelles R; da Rosa ELS
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(3):319-335. PubMed ID: 33161500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
    Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two-dimensional lateral cephalogram and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography superimpositions: a comparative study.
    Heinz J; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30342757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach.
    Ying X; Tian K; Zhang K; Ma X; Guo H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):529. PubMed ID: 34654418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative outcomes of two- and three-dimensional planning in orthognathic surgery: A comparative study.
    Wu TY; Lin HH; Lo LJ; Ho CT
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1101-1111. PubMed ID: 28528114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
    Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing cone beam CT scan height as a method of radiation reduction for photorealistic three-dimensional orthognathic planning.
    Lin CY; Hsung TC; Khambay B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):907-12. PubMed ID: 25976036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.