These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29407245)

  • 1. Working memory cannot regulate overt emotional capture.
    Wingert KM; Blais C; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():52-64. PubMed ID: 29407245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of negative emotional content on attentional maintenance in working memory.
    Plancher G; Massol S; Dorel T; Chainay H
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 30584794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Only "efficient" emotional stimuli affect the content of working memory during free-recollection from natural scenes.
    Buttafuoco A; Pedale T; Buchanan TW; Santangelo V
    Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 29147817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of emotional content on working memory capacity.
    Garrison KE; Schmeichel BJ
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Mar; 33(2):370-377. PubMed ID: 29436924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative emotional distraction on neural circuits for working memory in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Zhang JN; Xiong KL; Qiu MG; Zhang Y; Xie B; Wang J; Li M; Chen H; Zhang Y; Zhang JJ
    Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1531():94-101. PubMed ID: 23911835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain systems underlying attentional control and emotional distraction during working memory encoding.
    Ziaei M; Peira N; Persson J
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():276-86. PubMed ID: 24185015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of three levels of arousal on 3-back working memory task performance.
    Choi MH; Min YK; Kim HS; Kim JH; Yeon HW; Choi JS; Kim B; Min BC; Park JY; Jun JH; Yi JH; Tack GR; Chung SC
    Cogn Neurosci; 2013; 4(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24073694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory and individual differences in the encoding of vertical, horizontal and diagonal symmetry.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Pieroni L; Spataro P; Baddeley A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Sep; 141(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 22889674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.
    Gonzalez-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; Gomez-Velazquez FR; Alvelais Alarcón M; Moises de la Serna Tuya J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 17555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retro-Active Emotion: Do Negative Emotional Stimuli Disrupt Consolidation in Working Memory?
    Kandemir G; Akyürek EG; Nieuwenstein MR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169927. PubMed ID: 28103267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional stimuli capture spatial attention but do not modulate spatial memory.
    Bannerman RL; Temminck EV; Sahraie A
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():12-20. PubMed ID: 22664375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Looking inward: shifting attention within working memory representations alters emotional responses.
    Thiruchselvam R; Hajcak G; Gross JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1461-6. PubMed ID: 23137969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotion processing facilitates working memory performance.
    Lindström BR; Bohlin G
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Nov; 25(7):1196-204. PubMed ID: 21728906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deactivation of default-mode network and early suppression of decision-making areas during retrieval period by high-arousing emotions improves performance in verbal working memory task.
    Pegwal N; Pal A; Sharma R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 30341625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in working memory capacity and attentional control.
    Hiebel N; Zimmer HD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 25730638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 25436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.