These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29407602)

  • 1. Adding statistical regularity results in a global slowdown in visual search.
    Vaskevich A; Luria R
    Cognition; 2018 May; 174():19-27. PubMed ID: 29407602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.
    Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.
    Kóbor A; Horváth K; Kardos Z; Takács Á; Janacsek K; Csépe V; Nemeth D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1546-1566. PubMed ID: 31236822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent operation of implicit working memory under cognitive load.
    Ji E; Lee KM; Kim MS
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Oct; 55():214-222. PubMed ID: 28892738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual cueing under working memory load: selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning.
    Manginelli AA; Langer N; Klose D; Pollmann S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1103-17. PubMed ID: 23636949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory load improves early stages of independent visual processing.
    Cocchi L; Toepel U; De Lucia M; Martuzzi R; Wood SJ; Carter O; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 20974157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
    Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The working memory Ponzo illusion: Involuntary integration of visuospatial information stored in visual working memory.
    Shen M; Xu H; Zhang H; Shui R; Zhang M; Zhou J
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():26-35. PubMed ID: 25912893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective transfer of visual working memory training on Chinese character learning.
    Opitz B; Schneiders JA; Krick CM; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():1-11. PubMed ID: 24184440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical regularities guide the spatial scale of attention.
    Zhao J; Luo Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 27844342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.
    Kaiser D; Stein T; Peelen MV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 25896215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory for cross-domain sequences.
    Farrell S; Oberauer K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 23682972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working Memory-Driven Attention in Real-World Search.
    Jung S; Yoon Y; Han SW
    Perception; 2018 Sep; 47(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 30058444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the contributions of spatial and non-spatial working memory to priming of pop-out.
    Ahn J; Patel TN; Buetti S; Lleras A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1012-1026. PubMed ID: 28176214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Determines Visual Statistical Learning Performance? Insights From Information Theory.
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Frost R
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Dec; 43(12):e12803. PubMed ID: 31858628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aftereffect of perceived regularity.
    Ouhnana M; Bell J; Solomon JA; Kingdom FA
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23863511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Searching for bumps and ellipses on the ground and in the sky: no advantage for the ground plane.
    Jóhannesson OI; Sigurdardottir KÓ; Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():26-32. PubMed ID: 24025995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning what from where: Effects of spatial regularity on nonspatial sequence learning and updating.
    Filipowicz A; Anderson B; Danckert J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1447-56. PubMed ID: 24256413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regularity Extraction Across Species: Associative Learning Mechanisms Shared by Human and Non-Human Primates.
    Rey A; Minier L; Malassis R; Bogaerts L; Fagot J
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jul; 11(3):573-586. PubMed ID: 29785844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.