378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29407704)
1. Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology.
Lares M; Ncibi MC; Sillanpää M; Sillanpää M
Water Res; 2018 Apr; 133():236-246. PubMed ID: 29407704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microplastics in sewage sludge from the wastewater treatment plants in China.
Li X; Chen L; Mei Q; Dong B; Dai X; Ding G; Zeng EY
Water Res; 2018 Oct; 142():75-85. PubMed ID: 29859394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microplastics in wastewater and sludge from centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants: Effects of treatment systems and microplastic characteristics.
Maw MM; Boontanon N; Aung HKZZ; Jindal R; Fujii S; Visvanathan C; Boontanon SK
Chemosphere; 2024 Aug; 361():142536. PubMed ID: 38844106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IR microspectroscopic identification of microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants.
Hongprasith N; Kittimethawong C; Lertluksanaporn R; Eamchotchawalit T; Kittipongvises S; Lohwacharin J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(15):18557-18564. PubMed ID: 32198683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microplastics removal efficiency and risk analysis of wastewater treatment plants in Oman.
Al-Amri A; Yavari Z; Reza Nikoo M; Karimi M
Chemosphere; 2024 Jul; 359():142206. PubMed ID: 38710411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Membrane bioreactor and rapid sand filtration for the removal of microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant.
Bayo J; López-Castellanos J; Olmos S
Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Jul; 156():111211. PubMed ID: 32365007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.
González S; Petrovic M; Barceló D
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 67(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 17123581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater.
Pauwels B; Fru Ngwa F; Deconinck S; Verstraete W
Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microplastic removal and management strategies for wastewater treatment plants.
Ahmed SF; Islam N; Tasannum N; Mehjabin A; Momtahin A; Chowdhury AA; Almomani F; Mofijur M
Chemosphere; 2024 Jan; 347():140648. PubMed ID: 37952815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MBR pilot plant for textile wastewater treatment and reuse.
Lubello C; Caffaz S; Mangini L; Santianni D; Caretti C
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(10):115-24. PubMed ID: 17564377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada.
Gies EA; LeNoble JL; Noël M; Etemadifar A; Bishay F; Hall ER; Ross PS
Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Aug; 133():553-561. PubMed ID: 30041349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant.
Raju S; Carbery M; Kuttykattil A; Senthirajah K; Lundmark A; Rogers Z; Scb S; Evans G; Palanisami T
Water Res; 2020 Apr; 173():115549. PubMed ID: 32086069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Solutions to microplastic pollution - Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies.
Talvitie J; Mikola A; Koistinen A; Setälä O
Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():401-407. PubMed ID: 28686942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A membrane bioreactor with iron dosing and acidogenic co-fermentation for enhanced phosphorus removal and recovery in wastewater treatment.
Li RH; Wang XM; Li XY
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():402-412. PubMed ID: 29175759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment - a viable option to reduce the amount of polar pollutants discharged into surface waters?
Weiss S; Reemtsma T
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3837-47. PubMed ID: 18684484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study on characteristics of microplastic in wastewater of South Korea: Identification, quantification, and fate of microplastics during treatment process.
Hidayaturrahman H; Lee TG
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 Sep; 146():696-702. PubMed ID: 31426211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biodegradation and Metabolism of Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the Bioaugmented Activated Sludge Batch Bioreactor System by Heterotrophic and Nitrifying Bacteria.
Islam MS; Zhou H; Zytner RG
Water Environ Res; 2018 Feb; 90(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29348000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
