BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408300)

  • 1. The Potential of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Metastatic Spinal Disease versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lu VM; Alvi MA; Goyal A; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e859-e868. PubMed ID: 29408300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Surgery Spinal Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lu VM; Kerezoudis P; Gilder HE; McCutcheon BA; Phan K; Bydon M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Feb; 42(3):E177-E185. PubMed ID: 27285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery for Extraforaminal Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Akinduro OO; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Yoon JW; Eluchie J; Murad MH; Wang Z; Chen SG; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():924-938.e3. PubMed ID: 28803171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.
    Than KD; Park P; Fu KM; Nguyen S; Wang MY; Chou D; Nunley PD; Anand N; Fessler RG; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Akbarnia BA; Deviren V; Uribe JS; La Marca F; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 26943254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors.
    Wong AP; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Wong RH; Harvey MJ; Lam S; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E11. PubMed ID: 26235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hansen-Algenstaedt N; Kwan MK; Algenstaedt P; Chiu CK; Viezens L; Chan TS; Lee CK; Wellbrock J; Chan CYW; Schaefer C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 May; 42(10):789-797. PubMed ID: 27584676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results.
    Miscusi M; Polli FM; Forcato S; Ricciardi L; Frati A; Cimatti M; De Martino L; Ramieri A; Raco A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 25723122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.
    Zuckerman SL; Laufer I; Sahgal A; Yamada YJ; Schmidt MH; Chou D; Shin JH; Kumar N; Sciubba DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41 Suppl 20(Suppl 20):S246-S253. PubMed ID: 27753784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of open versus minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastases.
    Ntilikina Y; Collinet A; Tigan LV; Fabacher T; Steib JP; Charles YP
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 108(4):103274. PubMed ID: 35331924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Approach Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Approach.
    Kumar N; Malhotra R; Maharajan K; Zaw AS; Wu PH; Makandura MC; Po Liu GK; Thambiah J; Wong HK
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1015-E1021. PubMed ID: 27352374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for patients undergoing intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Helal A; Yolcu YU; Kamath A; Wahood W; Bydon M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 214():107176. PubMed ID: 35183850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.
    Hikata T; Isogai N; Shiono Y; Funao H; Okada E; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Ishii K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1082-E1087. PubMed ID: 27841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does MIS Surgery Allow for Shorter Constructs in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?
    Uribe JS; Beckman J; Mummaneni PV; Okonkwo D; Nunley P; Wang MY; Mundis GM; Park P; Eastlack R; Anand N; Kanter A; Lamarca F; Fessler R; Shaffrey CI; Lafage V; Chou D; Deviren V;
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):489-497. PubMed ID: 28362966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of radiographic results after minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgery for adult spinal deformity: a multicenter study of 184 patients.
    Haque RM; Mundis GM; Ahmed Y; El Ahmadieh TY; Wang MY; Mummaneni PV; Uribe JS; Okonkwo DO; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Kanter AS; La Marca F; Akbarnia BA; Park P; Lafage V; Terran JS; Shaffrey CI; Klineberg E; Deviren V; Fessler RG;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E13. PubMed ID: 24785478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of open and minimally invasive spinal surgery for the treatment of thoracolumbar metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a systematic review.
    Alshareef M; Klapthor G; Alawieh A; Lowe S; Frankel B
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2906-2914. PubMed ID: 34052895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.