These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408344)

  • 1. Non-corresponding authors in the era of meta-analyses.
    Manca A; Cugusi L; Dvir Z; Deriu F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():159-161. PubMed ID: 29408344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Authorship characteristics of orthodontic randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in non-orthodontic journals with impact factor.
    Alqaydi AR; Kanavakis G; Naser-Ud-Din S; Athanasiou AE
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29228139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of network meta-analysis in systematic reviews: a survey of authors.
    Lee AW
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 26791268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies.
    Cook DJ; Guyatt GH; Ryan G; Clifton J; Buckingham L; Willan A; McIlroy W; Oxman AD
    JAMA; 1993 Jun; 269(21):2749-53. PubMed ID: 8492400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.
    Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):249. PubMed ID: 29216930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics, Trends, and Quality of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in General Radiology between 2007 and 2015.
    Park JY; Lee KH; Ku YJ; Cho SG; Kim YJ; Lee HY; Kim JH
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 28363669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews.
    von Elm E; Poglia G; Walder B; Tramèr MR
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 14982913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facilitating the work of a meta-analyst.
    Beck CT
    Res Nurs Health; 1999 Dec; 22(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 10625867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. E-mail decay rates among corresponding authors in MEDLINE. The ability to communicate with and request materials from authors is being eroded by the expiration of e-mail addresses.
    Wren JD; Grissom JE; Conway T
    EMBO Rep; 2006 Feb; 7(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 16452921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Author contacts for retrieval of data for a meta-analysis on exercise and diet restriction.
    Gibson CA; Bailey BW; Carper MJ; Lecheminant JD; Kirk EP; Huang G; Dubose KD; Donnelly JE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 16571204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of electronic mail in biomedical communication.
    Costello R; Shaw A; Cheetham R; Moots RJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2000; 7(1):103-5. PubMed ID: 10641967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.
    Dixon E; Hameed M; Sutherland F; Cook DJ; Doig C
    Ann Surg; 2005 Mar; 241(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 15729067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors in three pharmacy journals.
    Dotson B; Slaughter RL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2011 Sep; 68(18):1730-4. PubMed ID: 21880889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)].
    Urrutia G; Tort S; Bonfill X;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 16464425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery.
    Villain B; Dechartres A; Boyer P; Ravaud P
    BMC Med; 2015 Jun; 13():131. PubMed ID: 26040278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.