These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408348)

  • 21. Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and Australia.
    Stanton K; Tibazarwa C; Certa H; Greggs W; Hillebold D; Jovanovich L; Woltering D; Sedlak R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jan; 6(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 19558203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In the shadow of the Cosmetic Directive--inconsistencies in EU environmental hazard classification requirements for UV-filters.
    Sobek A; Bejgarn S; Rudén C; Molander L; Breitholtz M
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Sep; 461-462():706-11. PubMed ID: 23770551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of river water quality using an integrated physicochemical, biological and ecotoxicological approach.
    Serpa D; Keizer JJ; Cassidy J; Cuco A; Silva V; Gonçalves F; Cerqueira M; Abrantes N
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 24715158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part I: environmental risk assessments of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients.
    Carlsson C; Johansson AK; Alvan G; Bergman K; Kühler T
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 364(1-3):67-87. PubMed ID: 16257037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing, managing and monitoring contaminated aquatic sediments.
    Chapman PM; Smith M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Oct; 64(10):2000-4. PubMed ID: 22863351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulated environmental risk estimation of engineered nanomaterials: a case of cosmetics in Johannesburg City.
    Musee N
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1181-95. PubMed ID: 21148195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Water quality standards for the protection of human health and aquatic ecosystems in Korea: current state and future perspective.
    Kwak JI; Nam SH; An YJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3108-3119. PubMed ID: 28374204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Research progress of pharmaceutical and personal care products on ecological and human health].
    Liu Y; Zhu L; Li J
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2009 Mar; 38(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 19408672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the framework of the REACH Regulation: part 4. Experimental terrestrial toxicity assays.
    Versonnen B; Tarazona JV; Cesnaitis R; Sobanska MA; Sobanski T; Bonnomet V; De Coen W
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 475():123-31. PubMed ID: 24238811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Environmental impacts on soil and groundwater at airports: origin, contaminants of concern and environmental risks.
    Nunes LM; Zhu YG; Stigter TY; Monteiro JP; Teixeira MR
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Nov; 13(11):3026-39. PubMed ID: 22002748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximizing the accuracy of field-derived numeric nutrient criteria in water quality regulations.
    McLaughlin DB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):133-7. PubMed ID: 24123826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
    Mooney C; Farrier D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment.
    Farré M; Gajda-Schrantz K; Kantiani L; Barceló D
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2009 Jan; 393(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 18987850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis.
    Hutchinson TH; Lyons BP; Thain JE; Law RJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 23820191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Towards sustainable management of groundwater: policy developments in The Netherlands.
    Lijzen JPA; Otte P; van Dreumel M
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jul; 485-486():804-809. PubMed ID: 24636799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Science, policy, and trends of metals risk assessment at EPA: how understanding metals bioavailability has changed metals risk assessment at US EPA.
    Reiley MC
    Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 17662477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigative monitoring within the European Water Framework Directive: a coastal blast furnace slag disposal, as an example.
    Borja A; Tueros I; Belzunce MJ; Galparsoro I; Garmendia JM; Revilla M; Solaun O; Valencia V
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Apr; 10(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 18385866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human health safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU: a legally imposed challenge to science.
    Pauwels M; Rogiers V
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 20006634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consumption and occurrence of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the aquatic environment in Spain.
    Ortiz de García S; Pinto Pinto G; García Encina P; Irusta Mata R
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Feb; 444():451-65. PubMed ID: 23287535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prioritization of pharmaceuticals based on risks to aquatic environments in Kazakhstan.
    Aubakirova B; Beisenova R; Boxall AB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 28120523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.