227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408353)
1. Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database.
Maggino L; Liu JB; Ecker BL; Pitt HA; Vollmer CM
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):844-857.e3. PubMed ID: 29408353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of peri-operative blood transfusions on post-pancreatectomy short-term outcomes: an analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Hallet J; Mahar AL; Tsang ME; Lin Y; Callum J; Coburn NG; Law CH; Karanicolas PJ
HPB (Oxford); 2015 Nov; 17(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 26301741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?
Beane JD; Borrebach JD; Zureikat AH; Kilbane EM; Thompson VM; Pitt HA
Ann Surg; 2021 Oct; 274(4):e355-e363. PubMed ID: 31663969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
Stiles ZE; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Glazer ES; Dong L; Wan JY; Behrman SW
J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():168-177. PubMed ID: 29804849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: what are the added risks?
Beane JD; House MG; Pitt SC; Kilbane EM; Hall BL; Parmar AD; Riall TS; Pitt HA
HPB (Oxford); 2015 Sep; 17(9):777-84. PubMed ID: 26201994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk Factors of Reoperation After Pancreatic Resection.
Lyu HG; Sharma G; Brovman E; Ejiofor J; Repaka A; Urman RD; Gold JS; Whang EE
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Jun; 62(6):1666-1675. PubMed ID: 28341868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.
Zureikat AH; Moser AJ; Boone BA; Bartlett DL; Zenati M; Zeh HJ
Ann Surg; 2013 Oct; 258(4):554-9; discussion 559-62. PubMed ID: 24002300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic and open distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body tumors: a single institutional assessment of perioperative outcomes and survival.
Ocuin LM; Miller-Ocuin JL; Novak SM; Bartlett DL; Marsh JW; Tsung A; Lee KK; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Oct; 18(10):835-842. PubMed ID: 27506992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Preoperative MELD Score Predict Adverse Outcomes Following Pancreatic Resection: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.
Al Abbas AI; Borrebach JD; Bellon J; Zureikat AH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Oct; 24(10):2259-2268. PubMed ID: 31468333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of ACS-NSQIP in reporting complications for patients undergoing pancreatectomy: underscoring the need for a pancreas-specific module.
Epelboym I; Gawlas I; Lee JA; Schrope B; Chabot JA; Allendorf JD
World J Surg; 2014 Jun; 38(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 24407939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the impact of conversion on outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy.
Beane JD; Pitt HA; Dolejs SC; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
HPB (Oxford); 2018 Apr; 20(4):356-363. PubMed ID: 29191691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term surgical morbidity and mortality of distal pancreatectomy performed for benign versus malignant diseases: a NSQIP analysis.
Daniel FE; Tamim HM; Hosni MN; Mailhac AC; Khalife MJ; Jamali FR; Faraj W
Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3927-3935. PubMed ID: 31598880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A Norwegian single-center study.
Sahakyan MA; Røsok BI; Kazaryan AM; Barkhatov L; Lai X; Kleive D; Ignjatovic D; Labori KJ; Edwin B
Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1271-1278. PubMed ID: 27498300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery: lessons learned from our initial experience.
Vicente E; Quijano Y; Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Malave L; Caruso R
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2017 Dec; 16(6):652-658. PubMed ID: 29291786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.
Kuo BJ; Vissoci JR; Egger JR; Smith ER; Grant GA; Haglund MM; Rice HE
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 19(3):361-371. PubMed ID: 28059679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of risk categories for in pancreaticoduodenectomy based on diagnosis.
Shubert CR; Kendrick ML; Thomsen KM; Farnell MB; Habermann EB
HPB (Oxford); 2015 May; 17(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25516234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution.
Goh BK; Tan YM; Chung YF; Cheow PC; Ong HS; Chan WH; Chow PK; Soo KC; Wong WK; Ooi LL
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):956-65. PubMed ID: 18936374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes after extended pancreatectomy in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Hartwig W; Gluth A; Hinz U; Koliogiannis D; Strobel O; Hackert T; Werner J; Büchler MW
Br J Surg; 2016 Nov; 103(12):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 27686238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hepato-pancreatectomy: how morbid? Results from the national surgical quality improvement project.
Tran TB; Dua MM; Spain DA; Visser BC; Norton JA; Poultsides GA
HPB (Oxford); 2015 Sep; 17(9):763-9. PubMed ID: 26058463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
