165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408542)
1. Particle size distribution of selected electronic nicotine delivery system products.
Oldham MJ; Zhang J; Rusyniak MJ; Kane DB; Gardner WP
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Mar; 113():236-240. PubMed ID: 29408542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of E-Liquid Humectants, Nicotine, and Flavorings on Aerosol Particle Size Distribution and Implications for Modeling Respiratory Deposition.
Stefaniak AB; Ranpara AC; Virji MA; LeBouf RF
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():782068. PubMed ID: 35372219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational modeling method to estimate secondhand exposure potential from exhalations during e-vapor product use under various real-world scenarios.
Edmiston JS; Rostami AA; Liang Q; Miller S; Sarkar MA
Intern Emerg Med; 2022 Oct; 17(7):2005-2016. PubMed ID: 36050572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aerodynamic particle size analysis of aerosols from pressurized metered-dose inhalers: comparison of Andersen 8-stage cascade impactor, next generation pharmaceutical impactor, and model 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer aerosol spectrometer.
Mitchell JP; Nagel MW; Wiersema KJ; Doyle CC
AAPS PharmSciTech; 2003 Oct; 4(4):E54. PubMed ID: 15198549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of new-generation high-power electronic nicotine delivery system as thermal aerosol generation device for inhaled bronchodilators.
Pourchez J; de Oliveira F; Perinel-Ragey S; Basset T; Vergnon JM; Prévôt N
Int J Pharm; 2017 Feb; 518(1-2):264-269. PubMed ID: 28062365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nicotine delivery from the refill liquid to the aerosol via high-power e-cigarette device.
Prévôt N; de Oliveira F; Perinel-Ragey S; Basset T; Vergnon JM; Pourchez J
Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):2592. PubMed ID: 28572636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of High-Power Electronic Nicotine Delivery System as an Alternative Aerosol Device for Terbutaline Delivery.
Chaoui M; Chevrel S; Perinel-Ragey S; Prévôt N; Pourchez J
Pharm Res; 2022 Mar; 39(3):587-597. PubMed ID: 35137358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of nicotine, glycerol, propylene glycol and water in electronic cigarette fluids using quantitative
Crenshaw MD; Tefft ME; Buehler SS; Brinkman MC; Clark PI; Gordon SM
Magn Reson Chem; 2016 Nov; 54(11):901-904. PubMed ID: 27495876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Electronic Cigarette User Modifications and E-liquid Adulteration on the Particle Size Profile of an Aerosolized Product.
Mulder HA; Patterson JL; Halquist MS; Kosmider L; Turner JBM; Poklis JL; Poklis A; Peace MR
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10221. PubMed ID: 31308389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeled Respiratory Tract Deposition of Aerosolized Oil Diluents Used in Δ
Ranpara A; Stefaniak AB; Williams K; Fernandez E; LeBouf RF
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():744166. PubMed ID: 34805068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Size aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols.
Kim CS; Trujillo D; Sackner MA
Am Rev Respir Dis; 1985 Jul; 132(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 4014858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiolabeling an Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Using Technetium Carbon Ultrafine Particles.
Holbrook LT; Zeman KL; Burke A; Jaspers I; Bennett WD
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2019 Feb; 32(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 30376396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Room air constituent concentrations from use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and cigarettes using different ventilation conditions.
Oldham MJ; Sehgal A; Cohen G; Chen J; Evans B; Heraldez D
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1736. PubMed ID: 33462299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of aerosols generated by high-power electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): Influence of atomizer, temperature and PG:VG ratios.
Dibaji SAR; Oktem B; Williamson L; DuMond J; Cecil T; Kim JP; Wickramasekara S; Myers M; Guha S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279309. PubMed ID: 36538548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterisation of mainstream and passive vapours emitted by selected electronic cigarettes.
Geiss O; Bianchi I; Barahona F; Barrero-Moreno J
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2015 Jan; 218(1):169-80. PubMed ID: 25455424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: regulatory and safety challenges: Singapore perspective.
Cheah NP; Chong NW; Tan J; Morsed FA; Yee SK
Tob Control; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 23204074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of potential passive exposure from commercial electronic nicotine delivery systems using exhaled breath analysis and computational fluid dynamic techniques.
Oldham MJ; Bailey PC; Castro N; Lang Q; Salehi A; Rostami AA
J Breath Res; 2021 Oct; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 34544050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aerosol droplet-size distribution and airborne nicotine portioning in particle and gas phases emitted by electronic cigarettes.
Lalo H; Leclerc L; Sorin J; Pourchez J
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21707. PubMed ID: 33303941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of nebulized particle size distribution with Malvern laser diffraction analyzer versus Andersen cascade impactor and low-flow Marple personal cascade impactor.
Kwong WT; Ho SL; Coates AL
J Aerosol Med; 2000; 13(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 11262437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro particle size distributions in electronic and conventional cigarette aerosols suggest comparable deposition patterns.
Zhang Y; Sumner W; Chen DR
Nicotine Tob Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):501-8. PubMed ID: 23042984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
