422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408686)
1. The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.
Lebastchi AH; Khouri RK; McLaren ID; Faerber GJ; Kraft KH; Hafez KS; Dauw CA; Bird VG; Stringer TF; Singla AK; Sorensen MD; Wessells H; Ambani SN
Urology; 2018 May; 115():51-58. PubMed ID: 29408686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.
Lee JT; Teshome M; de Virgilio C; Ishaque B; Qiu M; Dalman RL
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Feb; 51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 20022205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing medical student choices in the integrated vascular surgery match: Implications for future post-pandemic residency matches.
Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Chandra V; Coleman DM; Lee JT
J Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(4):1354-1361.e4. PubMed ID: 34023431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What makes a medical student avoid or enter a career in urology? Results of an international survey.
Kerfoot BP; Nabha KS; Masser BA; McCullough DL
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1953-7. PubMed ID: 16217365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives of Residency Applicants and Program Directors on the Role of Social Media in the 2021 Urology Residency Match.
Heard JR; Wyant WA; Loeb S; Marcovich R; Dubin JM
Urology; 2022 Jun; 164():68-73. PubMed ID: 34606880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Career Expectations and Preferences of Urology Residency Applicants.
Han J; Rabley A; Vlasak A; Bozorgmehri S; Bird V; Moy L
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():44-52. PubMed ID: 30315888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Away Rotations and Matching in Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency: Applicant and Program Director Perspectives.
Drolet BC; Brower JP; Lifchez SD; Janis JE; Liu PY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 27018690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applicants' choice of an ophthalmology residency program.
Yousuf SJ; Kwagyan J; Jones LS
Ophthalmology; 2013 Feb; 120(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 23084123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in matching to urology residency in Canada: are we becoming noncompetitive?
Melnyk M; Nelson H; Mickelson J; Macneily AE
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 23725943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interview experience, post-interview communication, and gender-based differences in the integrated vascular surgery residency match.
Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Sorondo S; Lee JT; Coleman DM; Chandra V
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):316-322.e2. PubMed ID: 34197947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A survey of women urology residents regarding career choice and practice challenges.
Jackson I; Bobbin M; Jordan M; Baker S
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Nov; 18(11):1867-72. PubMed ID: 19951224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Senior medical student opinions regarding the ideal urology interview day.
Jacobs JC; Guralnick ML; Sandlow JI; Langenstroer P; Begun FP; See WA; O'Connor RC
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 24981655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defining the Current Landscape of Women in Urology: An Analysis of Female Applicants, Residents, and Faculty at AUA-Accredited Residency Programs.
Findlay BL; Manka MG; Bole R; Dodge NA; Thompson RH; Granberg CF
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():59-63. PubMed ID: 33301743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Canadian Urology Fair: a model for minimizing the financial and academic costs of the residency selection process.
Grober ED; Matsumoto ED; Jewett MA; Chin JL;
Can J Surg; 2003 Dec; 46(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 14680354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]