These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29408902)

  • 1. Imaging of neural oscillations with embedded inferential and group prevalence statistics.
    Donhauser PW; Florin E; Baillet S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005990. PubMed ID: 29408902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial neuronal synchronization and the waveform of oscillations: Implications for EEG and MEG.
    Schaworonkow N; Nikulin VV
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 May; 15(5):e1007055. PubMed ID: 31086368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding brain oscillations with power dependencies in neuroimaging data.
    Dähne S; Nikulin VV; Ramírez D; Schreier PJ; Müller KR; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():334-48. PubMed ID: 24721331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG.
    Siems M; Pape AA; Hipp JF; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():345-355. PubMed ID: 26827813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal spatial filtering for brain oscillatory activity using the Relevance Vector Machine.
    Belardinelli P; Jalava A; Gross J; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):357-69. PubMed ID: 23729235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition.
    Nikulin VV; Nolte G; Curio G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(4):1528-35. PubMed ID: 21276858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging.
    Baillet S
    Nat Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 20(3):327-339. PubMed ID: 28230841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Permutation Statistics for Connectivity Analysis between Regions of Interest in EEG and MEG Data.
    Mamashli F; Hämäläinen M; Ahveninen J; Kenet T; Khan S
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7942. PubMed ID: 31138854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-retest reliability of resting-state magnetoencephalography power in sensor and source space.
    Martín-Buro MC; Garcés P; Maestú F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Jan; 37(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 26467848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
    Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
    Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method for localizing the sources of correlated cross-frequency oscillations in human brains.
    Tanaka H; Hayashida Y; Igasaki T; Murayama N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7017-20. PubMed ID: 22255954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
    Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying Granger causal relationships between neural power dynamics and variables of interest.
    Winkler I; Haufe S; Porbadnigk AK; Müller KR; Dähne S
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():489-504. PubMed ID: 25554431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.
    Ding L; Yuan H
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Apr; 34(4):775-95. PubMed ID: 22102512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.