These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29409303)

  • 1. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
    Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
    Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
    Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
    Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
    Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Magee SH; Ramesh J; Trevino JM; Varadarajulu S
    Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 23504490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
    Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slow-pull technique yields better quality smears: prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
    Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Szűcs M; Füredi Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Farkas K; Molnár T; Milassin Á; Bálint A; Szántó K; Hamar S; Kaizer L; Tiszlavicz L; Szepes Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):1369-1376. PubMed ID: 33016159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suction versus slow-pull for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic tumors: a prospective randomized trial.
    Cheng S; Brunaldi VO; Minata MK; Chacon DA; da Silveira EB; de Moura DT; Dos Santos ME; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; França RF; Jacomo AL; Artifon E
    HPB (Oxford); 2020 May; 22(5):779-786. PubMed ID: 31677985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with distinct negative pressure suction techniques in solid lesions: A retrospective study.
    Wang R; Wang J; Li Y; Duan Y; Wu X; Cheng B
    Oncol Lett; 2017 May; 13(5):3709-3716. PubMed ID: 28521473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Push
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Irie H; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Waragai Y; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Hashimoto Y; Hikichi T; Ohira H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 24(27):3006-3012. PubMed ID: 30038467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative diagnostic performance of different techniques for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Ramai D; Madhu D; Fugazza A; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Mangiavillano B; Gkolfakis P; Mohan BP; Hassan C; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):839-848.e5. PubMed ID: 36657607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.