294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29409441)
1. G4PromFinder: an algorithm for predicting transcription promoters in GC-rich bacterial genomes based on AT-rich elements and G-quadruplex motifs.
Di Salvo M; Pinatel E; Talà A; Fondi M; Peano C; Alifano P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):36. PubMed ID: 29409441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. bTSSfinder: a novel tool for the prediction of promoters in cyanobacteria and Escherichia coli.
Shahmuradov IA; Mohamad Razali R; Bougouffa S; Radovanovic A; Bajic VB
Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):334-340. PubMed ID: 27694198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RhoTermPredict: an algorithm for predicting Rho-dependent transcription terminators based on Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Salmonella enterica databases.
Di Salvo M; Puccio S; Peano C; Lacour S; Alifano P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 30845912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of putative promoters in 48 eukaryotic genomes on the basis of DNA free energy.
Yella VR; Kumar A; Bansal M
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4520. PubMed ID: 29540741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-wide prediction and validation of sigma70 promoters in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1.
Todt TJ; Wels M; Bongers RS; Siezen RS; van Hijum SA; Kleerebezem M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45097. PubMed ID: 23028780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using hidden Markov models to investigate G-quadruplex motifs in genomic sequences.
Yano M; Kato Y
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S15. PubMed ID: 25521044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-wide determination of transcription start sites reveals new insights into promoter structures in the actinomycete Corynebacterium glutamicum.
Albersmeier A; Pfeifer-Sancar K; Rückert C; Kalinowski J
J Biotechnol; 2017 Sep; 257():99-109. PubMed ID: 28412515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrative and applicable phylogenetic footprinting framework for cis-regulatory motifs identification in prokaryotic genomes.
Liu B; Zhang H; Zhou C; Li G; Fennell A; Wang G; Kang Y; Liu Q; Ma Q
BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17():578. PubMed ID: 27507169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triad pattern algorithm for predicting strong promoter candidates in bacterial genomes.
Dekhtyar M; Morin A; Sakanyan V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 9():233. PubMed ID: 18471287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferring regulatory elements from a whole genome. An analysis of Helicobacter pylori sigma(80) family of promoter signals.
Vanet A; Marsan L; Labigne A; Sagot MF
J Mol Biol; 2000 Mar; 297(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 10715205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SIGffRid: a tool to search for sigma factor binding sites in bacterial genomes using comparative approach and biologically driven statistics.
Touzain F; Schbath S; Debled-Rennesson I; Aigle B; Kucherov G; Leblond P
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():73. PubMed ID: 18237374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SPREAD: An ensemble predictor based on DNA autoencoder framework for discriminating promoters in
Zhou S; Zheng J; Jia C
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(12):13294-13305. PubMed ID: 36654047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-quality annotation of promoter regions for 913 bacterial genomes.
Rangannan V; Bansal M
Bioinformatics; 2010 Dec; 26(24):3043-50. PubMed ID: 20956245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computational analysis on the dissemination of non-B DNA structural motifs in promoter regions of 1180 cellular genomes.
Yella VR; Vanaja A
Biochimie; 2023 Nov; 214(Pt A):101-111. PubMed ID: 37311475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-scale computational and statistical analyses of high transcription potentialities in 32 prokaryotic genomes.
Sinoquet C; Demey S; Braun F
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Jun; 36(10):3332-40. PubMed ID: 18440978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. G-quadruplexes in promoters throughout the human genome.
Huppert JL; Balasubramanian S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2007; 35(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 17169996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The construction of a library of synthetic promoters revealed some specific features of strong Streptomyces promoters.
Seghezzi N; Amar P; Koebmann B; Jensen PR; Virolle MJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2011 Apr; 90(2):615-23. PubMed ID: 21243353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An iterative strategy combining biophysical criteria and duration hidden Markov models for structural predictions of Chlamydia trachomatis sigma66 promoters.
Mallios RR; Ojcius DM; Ardell DH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 10():271. PubMed ID: 19715597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. G-quadruplex prediction in E. coli genome reveals a conserved putative G-quadruplex-Hairpin-Duplex switch.
Kaplan OI; Berber B; Hekim N; Doluca O
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(19):9083-9095. PubMed ID: 27596596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Promoter addresses: revelations from oligonucleotide profiling applied to the Escherichia coli genome.
Sivaraman K; Seshasayee AS; Swaminathan K; Muthukumaran G; Pennathur G
Theor Biol Med Model; 2005 May; 2():20. PubMed ID: 15927055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
