These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29409766)
21. Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading. Paterson KB; Jordan TR Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 20516230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Vinckier F; Qiao E; Pallier C; Dehaene S; Cohen L J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):1-21. PubMed ID: 21566152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Early involvement of dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition: an ERP study. Rosazza C; Cai Q; Minati L; Paulignan Y; Nazir TA Brain Res; 2009 May; 1272():32-44. PubMed ID: 19332032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: an event-related potential study of the word superiority effect. Martin CD; Nazir T; Thierry G; Paulignan Y; Démonet JF Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16774747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How does Arabic orthographic connectivity modulate brain activity during visual word recognition: an ERP study. Taha H; Ibrahim R; Khateb A Brain Topogr; 2013 Apr; 26(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 22864655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ERP correlates of transposed-letter similarity effects: are consonants processed differently from vowels? Carreiras M; Vergara M; Perea M Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 419(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17507160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts. Yum YN; Law SP; Mo KN; Lau D; Su IF; Shum MS Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 26620688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Orthographic transparency modulates the grain size of orthographic processing: behavioral and ERP evidence from bilingualism. Lallier M; Carreiras M; Tainturier MJ; Savill N; Thierry G Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1505():47-60. PubMed ID: 23419894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding. Cutler J; Bodet A; Rivest J; Cavanagh P Vision Res; 2024 Sep; 222():108436. PubMed ID: 38820621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Contrasting effects of letter-spacing in alexia: further evidence that different strategies generate word length effects in reading. Price CJ; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Aug; 48(3):573-97. PubMed ID: 7568992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Are vowels and consonants processed differently? Event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Carreiras M; Gillon-Dowens M; Vergara M; Perea M J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):275-88. PubMed ID: 18510451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Model-generated lexical activity predicts graded ERP amplitudes in lexical decision. Braun M; Jacobs AM; Hahne A; Ricker B; Hofmann M; Hutzler F Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1073-1074():431-9. PubMed ID: 16464440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attention that covers letters is necessary for the left-lateralization of an early print-tuned ERP in Japanese hiragana. Okumura Y; Kasai T; Murohashi H Neuropsychologia; 2015 Mar; 69():22-30. PubMed ID: 25613647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text. Slattery TJ; Rayner K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1275-92. PubMed ID: 23709061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dependence of reading speed on letter spacing in central vision loss. Chung ST Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1288-98. PubMed ID: 22842309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impaired visual expertise for print in French adults with dyslexia as shown by N170 tuning. Mahé G; Bonnefond A; Gavens N; Dufour A; Doignon-Camus N Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3200-6. PubMed ID: 23088819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early print-tuned ERP response with minimal involvement of linguistic processing in Japanese Hiragana strings. Okumura Y; Kasai T; Murohashi H Neuroreport; 2014 Apr; 25(6):410-4. PubMed ID: 24356106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level event-related potentials. Rey A; Dufau S; Massol S; Grainger J Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 18608320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. Marí-Beffa P; Valdés B; Cullen DJ; Catena A; Houghton G Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Vissers CTWM; Chwilla DJ; Kolk HHJ Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1106(1):150-163. PubMed ID: 16843443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]