604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29409782)
1. Intrinsic EEG and task-related changes in EEG affect Go/NoGo task performance.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ; Coleman EP; Wilson EJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar; 125():17-28. PubMed ID: 29409782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resting state intrinsic EEG impacts on go stimulus-response processes.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):894-903. PubMed ID: 28258583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using principal components analysis to examine resting state EEG in relation to task performance.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13327. PubMed ID: 30613986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
Jia H; Li H; Yu D
J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain dynamics in the auditory Go/NoGo task as a function of EEG frequency.
Barry RJ; De Blasio F; Rushby JA; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Nov; 78(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 20600367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.
Barry RJ
Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 19028546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
