169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29410346)
1. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-Risk Lesions Detected by MRI-Guided Core Biopsy: Upgrade Rates at Surgical Excision and Implications for Management.
Michaels AY; Ginter PS; Dodelzon K; Naunheim MR; Abbey GN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):622-632. PubMed ID: 33439046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Machine Learning Model to Predict Pathologic Upgrade and Reduce Unnecessary Surgical Excision.
Bahl M; Barzilay R; Yedidia AB; Locascio NJ; Yu L; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):810-818. PubMed ID: 29039725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the frequency of upgrade to malignancy following surgical excision of high-risk breast lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ identified by core needle biopsy.
Allen A; Cauthen A; Dale P; Jean-Louis C; Lord A; Smith B
Breast J; 2019 Jan; 25(1):103-106. PubMed ID: 30461129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy.
Cha E; Ambinder EB; Oluyemi ET; Mullen LA; Panigrahi B; Rossi J; Di Carlo PA; Myers KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Dec; 196(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 36242709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathologic Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Digital 2D Versus Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Bahl M; Lamb LR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 28834441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Bahl M; Pinnamaneni N; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):582-590. PubMed ID: 30938625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis.
Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium.
Conant EF; Beaber EF; Sprague BL; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Onega T; Tosteson AN; McCarthy AM; Poplack SP; Haas JS; Armstrong K; Schnall MD; Barlow WE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 156(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 26931450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
