BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29410346)

  • 21. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Flat Epithelial Atypia: Upgrade Rates and Risk-Stratification Approach to Support Informed Decision Making.
    Lamb LR; Bahl M; Gadd MA; Lehman CD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Dec; 225(6):696-701. PubMed ID: 29100673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast lesions diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy: Can shearwave elastography predict histologic upgrade after surgery or vaccuum assisted excision?
    Sohn YM; Seo M
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():150-155. PubMed ID: 29524785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Not all false positive diagnoses are equal: On the prognostic implications of false-positive diagnoses made in breast MRI versus in mammography / digital tomosynthesis screening.
    Kuhl CK; Keulers A; Strobel K; Schneider H; Gaisa N; Schrading S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 29426360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.
    Bahl M; Gaffney S; McCarthy AM; Lowry KP; Dang PA; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 29272213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
    Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
    Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
    McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery.
    Urano M; Shiraki N; Kawai T; Goto T; Endo Y; Yoshimoto N; Toyama T; Shibamoto Y
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 26198975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
    Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
    Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
    Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Synthetic 2-Dimensional Mammography Can Replace Digital Mammography as an Adjunct to Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Feb; 54(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30281557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.
    Polat DS; Schopp JG; Arjmandi F; Porembka J; Sarode V; Farr D; Xi Y; Dogan BE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jan; 185(2):479-494. PubMed ID: 33010022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An audit of mammographic screen detected lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed on initial image guided needle biopsy: how has our practice changed over 10 years?
    Batohi B; Fang C; Michell MJ; Morel J; Shah C; Wijesuriya S; Peacock C; Rahim R; Wasan R; Goligher J; Satchithananda K
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Aug; 74(8):653.e19-653.e25. PubMed ID: 31078275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
    Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.