These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29410883)

  • 1. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading consensus on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Ramakrishnan VM; Bossert K; Singer G; Lehmann K; Hefermehl LJ
    Cent European J Urol; 2017; 70(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 29410883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
    Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
    Offermann A; Hohensteiner S; Kuempers C; Ribbat-Idel J; Schneider F; Becker F; Hupe MC; Duensing S; Merseburger AS; Kirfel J; Reischl M; Lubczyk V; Kuefer R; Perner S
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2017; 4():157. PubMed ID: 29034236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Faraj SF; Bezerra SM; Yousefi K; Fedor H; Glavaris S; Han M; Partin AW; Humphreys E; Tosoian J; Johnson MH; Davicioni E; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE; Netto GJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146189. PubMed ID: 26731672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
    Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
    Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
    Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Impact of International Association of Urological Pathology Gleason scoring system on prostatic carcinoma grading: a preliminary analysis of 185 cases].
    Wang G; Shen D
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 43(10):677-9. PubMed ID: 25567594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modified International Society of Urological Pathology system improves concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy tumour grade.
    Hennes DMZB; Sewell J; Kerger M; Hovens CM; Peters JS; Costello AJ; Ryan A; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2021 Dec; 128 Suppl 3():45-51. PubMed ID: 34310033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
    Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
    Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.
    Zelic R; Giunchi F; Fridfeldt J; Carlsson J; Davidsson S; Lianas L; Mascia C; Zugna D; Molinaro L; Vincent PH; Zanetti G; Andrén O; Richiardi L; Akre O; Fiorentino M; Pettersson A
    Clin Epidemiol; 2022; 14():59-70. PubMed ID: 35082531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
    Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.