These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Dacron vs vein for femoropopliteal arterial bypass. Should the saphenous vein be spared? Yashar JJ; Thompson R; Burnard RJ; Weyman AK; Yashar J; Hopkins RW Arch Surg; 1981 Aug; 116(8):1037-40. PubMed ID: 6455108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A five- to seven-year experience with externally-supported Dacron prostheses in axillofemoral and femoropopliteal bypass. Schultz GA; Sauvage LR; Mathisen SR; Mansfield PB; Smith JC; Davis CC; Hall DG; Rittenhouse EA; Kowalsky TE Ann Vasc Surg; 1986 Sep; 1(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 2973796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of noncrimped, externally supported (EXS) and crimped, nonsupported Dacron prostheses for axillofemoral and above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Kenney DA; Sauvage LR; Wood SJ; Berger K; Davis CC; Smith JC; Rittenhouse EA; Hall DG; Mansfield PB Surgery; 1982 Dec; 92(6):931-46. PubMed ID: 6216620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Debatable Choice of Iliac Inflow Source for Redo Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Bypass. Gabrielli R; Ciocca F; Dante A; Musilli A; Maiorano M; Ventura M Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 52():316.e15-316.e19. PubMed ID: 29886210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A contemporary meta-analysis of Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for femoropopliteal bypass grafting. Takagi H; Goto SN; Matsui M; Manabe H; Umemoto T J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 52(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 20471778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical results of femoropopliteal bypass using externally supported (EXS) Dacron grafts: with a comparison of above- and below-knee anastomosis. Matsubara J; Nagasue M; Tsuchishima S; Nakatani B; Shimizu T J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1990; 31(6):731-4. PubMed ID: 2148172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dacron-velour-prostheses: problems of implantation in the femoropopliteal area. Angiographic and histologic results (author's transl)]. Corovic D; Kirchhoff PG; Sinapius D Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1974 Dec; 22(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 4281542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoropopliteal composite dacron and autogenous vein bypass grafts. A preliminary report. Linton RR; Wirthlin LS Arch Surg; 1973 Nov; 107(5):748-53. PubMed ID: 4270358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Criteria for evaluation of new arterial prostheses by comparing vein with dacron femoropopliteal bypasses. Reichle FA Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 May; 146(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 148109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Sparks mandril in femoropopliteal bypass. Roberts PN; Hopkinson BR Br Med J; 1977 Nov; 2(6096):1190-1. PubMed ID: 145262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New technique for construction of coposite Dacron vein grafts for femoro-distal popliteal bypass in the severely ischemic leg. Lord JW; Sadranagani B; Bajwa G; Rossi G Ann Surg; 1975 May; 181(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 124161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral reconstruction when adequate saphenous vein is lacking. Myhre HO Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1985; 529():73-5. PubMed ID: 2938388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The current status of femoropopliteal bypass for arteriosclerotic occlusive disease: a panel discussion. Barker WF; Crawford ES; Mannick JA; Wylie EJ Surgery; 1976 Jan; 79(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 128841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]