216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29411385)
1. Biogeographic constraints to marine conservation in a changing climate.
Fredston-Hermann A; Gaines SD; Halpern BS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Oct; 1429(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 29411385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating climate change adaptation into marine protected area planning.
Wilson KL; Tittensor DP; Worm B; Lotze HK
Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Jun; 26(6):3251-3267. PubMed ID: 32222010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anticipating changes to future connectivity within a network of marine protected areas.
Coleman MA; Cetina-Heredia P; Roughan M; Feng M; van Sebille E; Kelaher BP
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Sep; 23(9):3533-3542. PubMed ID: 28122402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits and Challenges of Scaling Up Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Verde Island Passage, Central Philippines.
Horigue V; Pressey RL; Mills M; Brotánková J; Cabral R; Andréfouët S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135789. PubMed ID: 26288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.
Smith JG; Free CM; Lopazanski C; Brun J; Anderson CR; Carr MH; Claudet J; Dugan JE; Eurich JG; Francis TB; Hamilton SL; Mouillot D; Raimondi PT; Starr RM; Ziegler SL; Nickols KJ; Caselle JE
Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Oct; 29(19):5634-5651. PubMed ID: 37439293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coupling ecology and GIS to evaluate efficacy of marine protected areas in Hawaii.
Friedlander AM; Brown EK; Monaco ME
Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 17494391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pollution exposure on marine protected areas: A global assessment.
Partelow S; von Wehrden H; Horn O
Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Nov; 100(1):352-358. PubMed ID: 26330016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.
Robinson JL; Fordyce JA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173443. PubMed ID: 28301488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of spatial heterogeneity for management of marine protected areas (MPAs): examples from assemblages of rocky coasts in the northwest Mediterranean.
Benedetti-Cecchi L; Bertocci I; Micheli F; Maggi E; Fosella T; Vaselli S
Mar Environ Res; 2003 May; 55(5):429-58. PubMed ID: 12628195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current status of marine protected areas in latin america and the Caribbean.
Guarderas AP; Hacker SD; Lubchenco J
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18717690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weak biodiversity connectivity in the European network of no-take marine protected areas.
Assis J; Fragkopoulou E; Serrão EA; Horta E Costa B; Gandra M; Abecasis D
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145664. PubMed ID: 33940752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system.
Roberts KE; Cook CN; Beher J; Treml EA
Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):699-710. PubMed ID: 32623761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One size does not fit all: the emerging frontier in large-scale marine conservation.
Toonen RJ; Wilhelm T'; Maxwell SM; Wagner D; Bowen BW; Sheppard CR; Taei SM; Teroroko T; Moffitt R; Gaymer CF; Morgan L; Lewis N; Sheppard AL; Parks J; Friedlander AM;
Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Dec; 77(1-2):7-10. PubMed ID: 24246654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An approach to incorporating inferred connectivity of adult movement into marine protected area design with limited data.
Friesen SK; Martone R; Rubidge E; Baggio JA; Ban NC
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01890. PubMed ID: 30929286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of biogeographic classification schemes for conservation planning: application to New Zealand's coastal marine environment.
Shears NT; Smith F; Babcock RC; Duffy CA; Villouta E
Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):467-81. PubMed ID: 18294299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles.
Fulton EA; Bax NJ; Bustamante RH; Dambacher JM; Dichmont C; Dunstan PK; Hayes KR; Hobday AJ; Pitcher R; Plagányi ÉE; Punt AE; Savina-Rolland M; Smith AD; Smith DC
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 370(1681):. PubMed ID: 26460131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation.
Weeks R; Russ GR; Alcala AC; White AT
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):531-40. PubMed ID: 19843129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Climate change effects on marine protected areas: Projected decline of benthic species in the North Sea.
Weinert M; Mathis M; Kröncke I; Pohlmann T; Reiss H
Mar Environ Res; 2021 Jan; 163():105230. PubMed ID: 33419580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
