506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29411506)
1. A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Cmelak AJ; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 29411506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating the uncertainty of calculated out-of-field organ dose from a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 19(4):319-324. PubMed ID: 29896876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of the out-of-field dose calculations using a model based algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Ding GX
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):N113-28. PubMed ID: 24925858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving GPU-OpenCL-based Monte Carlo dose calculation toward clinical use: Automatic beam commissioning and source sampling for treatment plan dose calculation.
Tian Z; Li Y; Hassan-Rezaeian N; Jiang SB; Jia X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 28300376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.
Ojala JJ; Kapanen MK; Hyödynmaa SJ; Wigren TK; Pitkänen MA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4662. PubMed ID: 24710454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MLC parameters from static fields to VMAT plans: an evaluation in a RT-dedicated MC environment (PRIMO).
Paganini L; Reggiori G; Stravato A; Palumbo V; Mancosu P; Lobefalo F; Gaudino A; Fogliata A; Scorsetti M; Tomatis S
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):216. PubMed ID: 31791355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling Elekta VersaHD using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system for photon beams: A single-institution experience.
Zhang Y; Le AH; Tian Z; Iqbal Z; Chiu T; Gu X; Pugachev A; Reynolds R; Park YK; Lin MH; Stojadinovic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):33-42. PubMed ID: 31471950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implementation and evaluation of the Acuros dose calculation algorithm.
Yan C; Combine AG; Bednarz G; Lalonde RJ; Hu B; Dickens K; Wynn R; Pavord DC; Saiful Huq M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):195-209. PubMed ID: 28834214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
