These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29411587)
1. [Confounding – a recurring problem]. Thoresen M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2018 Feb; 138(3):. PubMed ID: 29411587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpreting results of observational research. Problem with confounders can be tackled. Buck D; Sutton M BMJ; 1994 Nov; 309(6966):1439. PubMed ID: 7695734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A statistics primer. Greenfield ML; Kuhn JE; Wojtys EM Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(3):393-5. PubMed ID: 8734894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data. Weiss NS; Hutter CM J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(16):1277. PubMed ID: 21788593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An even clearer portrait of bias in observational studies? Davies NM Epidemiology; 2015 Jul; 26(4):505-8. PubMed ID: 25978797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Confounding in evaluating the effectiveness of influenza vaccine. Mori M; Oura A; Ohnishi H; Washio M Vaccine; 2008 Nov; 26(50):6459-61. PubMed ID: 18573295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [What can we say about causality?]. Stensrud MJ; Aalen OO Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Sep; 135(16):1465-7. PubMed ID: 26356459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity? Sedgwick P BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1435. PubMed ID: 25778910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]