These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29412222)

  • 1. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique.
    Ayse Gozde T; Metin S; Mubin U
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Feb; 32():e005. PubMed ID: 29412222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths.
    Bottino MA; Campos F; Ramos NC; Rippe MP; Valandro LF; Melo RM
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):E83-91. PubMed ID: 25405903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal fit of class II ceromer inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Kükrer D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 33(6):436-42. PubMed ID: 16671990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique.
    Karakaya S; Sengun A; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 15899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptations of Ceramic Inlay Restorations Associated with Immediate vs Delayed Dentin Sealing Techniques.
    Ashy LM; Marghalani H; Silikas N
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 31860913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography.
    Al-Imam H; Michou S; Benetti AR; Gotfredsen K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 46(3):274-281. PubMed ID: 30387868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.
    Sandoval MJ; Rocca GT; Krejci I; Mandikos M; Dietschi D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Dec; 19(9):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25877233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.
    Müller V; Friedl KH; Friedl K; Hahnel S; Handel G; Lang R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):607-612. PubMed ID: 27507168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
    Ender A; Bienz S; Mörmann W; Mehl A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micro-CT Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays: Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Five and Three Axis CAM Systems with a Heat Press Technique.
    Alajaji NK; Bardwell D; Finkelman M; Ali A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27680508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.