These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29412366)

  • 1. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localized three-body wear of resin composites.
    Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1994 Dec; 34():19-27. PubMed ID: 8935090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro contact wear of dental composites.
    Nagarajan VS; Jahanmir S; Thompson VP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14698775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Curing light intensity effects on wear resistance of two resin composites.
    St-Georges AJ; Swift EJ; Thompson JY; Heymann HO
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 12120780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites.
    Lim BS; Ferracane JL; Condon JR; Adey JD
    Dent Mater; 2002 Jan; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11740959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation.
    Belli R; Pelka M; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):984-93. PubMed ID: 19699255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-body-wear resistance of the experimental composites containing filler treated with hydrophobic silane coupling agents.
    Nihei T; Dabanoglu A; Teranaka T; Kurata S; Ohashi K; Kondo Y; Yoshino N; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):760-4. PubMed ID: 17964643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simulated Wear of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.
    Takamizawa T; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Berry TP; Tsujimoto A; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 26669501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.
    Engelhardt F; Hahnel S; Preis V; Rosentritt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2123-2130. PubMed ID: 26745959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Kawai K; Tsuchitani Y
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 7576382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of filler size on wear resistance of resin cement.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Katoh Y
    Odontology; 2001 Nov; 89(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 14530920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin.
    Han JM; Zhang H; Choe HS; Lin H; Zheng G; Hong G
    Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 25007731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro wear of flowable resin composite for posterior restorations.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Suzuki M
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact- and contact-free wear between various resin composites.
    Osiewicz MA; Werner A; Pytko-Polonczyk J; Roeters FJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 25498520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the tooth-restoration interface wear resistance of two cementation techniques: effect of a surface sealant.
    Prakki A; Ribeiro IW; Cilli R; Mondelli RF
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 16382597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cyclic impact loading on the surface properties of flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S
    Dent Mater J; 2014; 33(6):874-9. PubMed ID: 25483388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions.
    Sumino N; Tsubota K; Takamizawa T; Shiratsuchi K; Miyazaki M; Latta MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):820-7. PubMed ID: 23638859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.