481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29412450)
1. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Gooszen JAH; Goense L; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI
Br J Surg; 2018 Apr; 105(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 29412450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Management and outcome of cervical versus intrathoracic manifestation of cervical anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.
van Rossum PSN; Haverkamp L; Carvello M; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26919029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrathoracic manifestations of cervical anastomotic leaks after transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy.
van Heijl M; van Wijngaarden AK; Lagarde SM; Busch OR; van Lanschot JJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI
Br J Surg; 2010 May; 97(5):726-31. PubMed ID: 20235083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Tu DH; Qu R; Ping W; Yang G; Fu X; Cai Y
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 May; 61(5):990-998. PubMed ID: 35325107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy†.
Van Daele E; Van de Putte D; Ceelen W; Van Nieuwenhove Y; Pattyn P
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 22(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 26433973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis.
van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; de Wilt JH; Rosman C
Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24776753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):758. PubMed ID: 31870427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management and outcomes of anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer.
Duan X; Bai W; Ma Z; Yue J; Shang X; Jiang H; Yu Z
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():304-309. PubMed ID: 32891347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.
Guo J; Chu X; Liu Y; Zhou N; Ma Y; Liang C
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 12():402. PubMed ID: 25547979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Persisting symptoms after intrathoracic anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy for cancer.
van der Schaaf M; Lagergren J; Lagergren P
Br J Surg; 2012 Jan; 99(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 22068914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: large, collaborative, observational TENTACLE cohort study.
Ubels S; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense S; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; van Det MJ; Griffiths EA; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Nieuwenhuijzen G; Polat F; Schouten J; Siersema PD; Singh P; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; van Workum F; Rosman C;
Br J Surg; 2023 Jun; 110(7):852-863. PubMed ID: 37196149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Outcome of Middle Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with Intrathoracic or Cervical Anastomosis.
Huang HT; Wang F; Shen L; Xia CQ; Lu CX; Zhong CJ
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 63(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 24715527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
