These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2941389)
1. An approach to Down syndrome in light of Infant Doe. Elkins TE; Brown D Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):419-40. PubMed ID: 2941389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal nurses' attitudes, beliefs, and feelings toward the care and management of fetal-infants. Richey DA J Perinatol; 1988; 8(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 3193266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives. Ciulla JB Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical considerations in the life of a child with Down syndrome. Pueschel SM Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2533587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn. Moreno JD Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe. Carter BS J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The tyranny of autonomy. Sondheimer HM Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(2):51. PubMed ID: 2045283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physicians' attitudes toward discretionary medical treatment of Down's syndrome infants. Affleck GG Ment Retard; 1980 Apr; 18(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 6454045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-saving therapy for newborns: a questionnaire survey in the state of Massachusetts. Todres ID; Guillemin J; Grodin MA; Batten D Pediatrics; 1988 May; 81(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 2965806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An infant bioethical review committee in an urban medical center. Fleischman AR Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 3721843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue. Lang GC West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]