These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29415099)

  • 1. Evaluation of Watershed-Scale Simulations of In-Stream Pesticide Concentrations from Off-Target Spray Drift.
    Winchell MF; Pai N; Brayden BH; Stone C; Whatling P; Hanzas JP; Stryker JJ
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Jan; 47(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 29415099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling spray drift and runoff-related inputs of pesticides to receiving water.
    Zhang X; Luo Y; Goh KS
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Mar; 234():48-58. PubMed ID: 29156441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Wind Speed and Direction and Key Meteorological Parameters on Potential Pesticide Drift Mass Loadings from Sequential Aerial Applications.
    Desmarteau DA; Ritter AM; Hendley P; Guevara MW
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 31589364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soil and Water Assessment Tool model predictions of annual maximum pesticide concentrations in high vulnerability watersheds.
    Winchell MF; Peranginangin N; Srinivasan R; Chen W
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 May; 14(3):358-368. PubMed ID: 29193759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coupled modeling using PRZM/RICEWQ and SWAT for the North Tiaoxi Watershed.
    Cheng Y; Zhou J; Liao J; Mao D; Chen W; Shan Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(11):12635-12645. PubMed ID: 32006327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coupling field-scale and watershed models for regulatory modeling of pesticide aquatic exposures in streams.
    Ghebremichael L; Chen W; Jacobson A; Roy C; Perkins DB; Brain R
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2022 Nov; 18(6):1678-1693. PubMed ID: 35212130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The agricultural dispersal-valley drift spray drift modeling system compared with pesticide drift data.
    Allwine KJ; Thistle HW; Teske ME; Anhold J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 May; 21(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 12013131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Landscape-level approach to assess aquatic exposure via spray drift for pesticides: a case study in a Mediterranean area.
    Padovani L; Capri E; Trevisan M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jun; 38(12):3239-46. PubMed ID: 15260319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal-spatial patterns of three types of pesticide loadings in a middle-high latitude agricultural watershed.
    Ouyang W; Cai G; Tysklind M; Yang W; Hao F; Liu H
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 122():377-386. PubMed ID: 28622630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.
    de Snoo GR; de Wit PJ
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Sep; 41(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 9756699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic modeling of organophosphate pesticide load in surface water in the northern San Joaquin Valley watershed of California.
    Luo Y; Zhang X; Liu X; Ficklin D; Zhang M
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Dec; 156(3):1171-81. PubMed ID: 18457909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.
    Stadler R; Regenauer W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):971-3. PubMed ID: 16628944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response of macroinvertebrate communities to temporal dynamics of pesticide mixtures: A case study from the Sacramento River watershed, California.
    Chiu MC; Hunt L; Resh VH
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Dec; 219():89-98. PubMed ID: 27744143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France).
    Vernier F; Leccia-Phelpin O; Lescot JM; Minette S; Miralles A; Barberis D; Scordia C; Kuentz-Simonet V; Tonneau JP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6923-6950. PubMed ID: 27726081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Passive sampling and ecohydrologic modeling to investigate pesticide surface water loading in the Zollner Creek watershed, Oregon, USA.
    Janney P; Jenkins J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 819():152955. PubMed ID: 35007592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A geo-referenced modeling environment for ecosystem risk assessment: organophosphate pesticides in an agriculturally dominated watershed.
    Luo Y; Zhang M
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(2):664-74. PubMed ID: 19244487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift: A South African ground application case study.
    Nsibande SA; Dabrowski JM; van der Walt E; Venter A; Forbes PB
    Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():454-61. PubMed ID: 26171732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regulatory Modeling of Pesticide Aquatic Exposures in California's Agricultural Receiving Waters.
    Xie Y; Luo Y; Singhasemanon N; Goh KS
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Nov; 47(6):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 30512076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting pesticide environmental risk in intensive agricultural areas. I: Screening level risk assessment of individual chemicals in surface waters.
    Verro R; Finizio A; Otto S; Vighi M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jan; 43(2):522-9. PubMed ID: 19238989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.