These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29415194)

  • 1. A semiparametric model for wearable sensor-based physical activity monitoring data with informative device wear.
    Song J; Swartz MD; Gabriel KP; Basen-Engquist K
    Biostatistics; 2019 Apr; 20(2):287-298. PubMed ID: 29415194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wearable device adherence among insufficiently-active young adults is independent of identity and motivation for physical activity.
    Wu J; Olson JL; Brunke-Reese D; Lagoa CM; Conroy DE
    J Behav Med; 2024 Apr; 47(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 37642938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal quality and patient experience with wearable devices for epilepsy management.
    Nasseri M; Nurse E; Glasstetter M; Böttcher S; Gregg NM; Laks Nandakumar A; Joseph B; Pal Attia T; Viana PF; Bruno E; Biondi A; Cook M; Worrell GA; Schulze-Bonhage A; Dümpelmann M; Freestone DR; Richardson MP; Brinkmann BH
    Epilepsia; 2020 Nov; 61 Suppl 1():S25-S35. PubMed ID: 32497269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing value imputation for physical activity data measured by accelerometer.
    Lee JA; Gill J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):490-506. PubMed ID: 26994215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Device Agnostic Approach to Predict Children's Activity from Consumer Wearable Accelerometer Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Weaver RG; White J; Finnegan O; Nelakuditi S; Zhu X; Burkart S; Beets M; Brown T; Pate R; Welk GJ; DE Zambotti M; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Armstrong B; Adams EL; Reesor-Oyer L; Pfledderer CD; Bastyr M; VON Klinggraeff L; Parker H
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Feb; 56(2):370-379. PubMed ID: 37707503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.
    Moore HE; Haydel KF; Banda JA; Fiterau M; Desai M; Robinson TN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0210006. PubMed ID: 30596771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.
    Zhou SM; Hill RA; Morgan K; Stratton G; Gravenor MB; Bijlsma G; Brophy S
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007447. PubMed ID: 25968000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical Activity in Adults With Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators in the Post-Myocardial Infarction Period.
    Tripp C; Burch AE; Erath JW; Hain A; Sears SF
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev; 2020 May; 40(3):164-166. PubMed ID: 31923008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A function-based approach to model the measurement error in wearable devices.
    Jadhav S; Tekwe CD; Luan Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4886-4902. PubMed ID: 36036429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of 12 Wearable Devices for Estimating Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Using a Metabolic Chamber and the Doubly Labeled Water Method: Validation Study.
    Murakami H; Kawakami R; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Nakata Y; Ohkawara K; Sasai H; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Aug; 7(8):e13938. PubMed ID: 31376273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing wearable device data using marked point processes.
    Yang Y; Wang MC
    Biometrics; 2021 Mar; 77(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 32282947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
    Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usability and Accuracy of a Smartwatch for the Assessment of Physical Activity in the Elderly Population: Observational Study.
    Martinato M; Lorenzoni G; Zanchi T; Bergamin A; Buratin A; Azzolina D; Gregori D
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e20966. PubMed ID: 33949953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring.
    Yang CC; Hsu YL
    Sensors (Basel); 2010; 10(8):7772-88. PubMed ID: 22163626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploratory study to evaluate the acceptability of a wearable accelerometer to assess motor progression in motor neuron disease.
    Beswick E; Christides A; Symonds A; Johnson M; Fawcett T; Newton J; Lyle D; Weaver C; Chandran S; Pal S
    J Neurol; 2024 Aug; 271(8):5083-5101. PubMed ID: 38805054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study.
    Keadle SK; Shiroma EJ; Freedson PS; Lee IM
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1210. PubMed ID: 25421941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the challenges in obtaining physical activity data from women using hip-worn accelerometers.
    O'Brien WJ; Shultz SP; Firestone RT; George L; Breier BH; Kruger R
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Aug; 17(7):922-930. PubMed ID: 28504054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of selected methodological factors on data collection outcomes in observational studies of device-measured physical behaviour in adults: A systematic review.
    Pulsford RM; Brocklebank L; Fenton SAM; Bakker E; Mielke GI; Tsai LT; Atkin AJ; Harvey DL; Blodgett JM; Ahmadi M; Wei L; Rowlands A; Doherty A; Rangul V; Koster A; Sherar LB; Holtermann A; Hamer M; Stamatakis E
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2023 Mar; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 36890553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.
    Vanhelst J; Vidal F; Drumez E; Béghin L; Baudelet JB; Coopman S; Gottrand F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 30940079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.