502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29415585)
1. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
Hunter CR; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
Ricketts T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
Reinhart PN; Souza PE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
Shi LF; Doherty KA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1328-40. PubMed ID: 18664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise.
Krueger M; Schulte M; Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Meis M; Brand T; Holube I
Am J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 26(3S):378-392. PubMed ID: 29049622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
