These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29416057)

  • 1. Visuospatial asymmetries do not modulate the cheerleader effect.
    Carragher DJ; Lawrence BJ; Thomas NA; Nicholls MER
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2548. PubMed ID: 29416057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited evidence of hierarchical encoding in the cheerleader effect.
    Carragher DJ; Thomas NA; Gwinn OS; Nicholls MER
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9329. PubMed ID: 31249339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive.
    Walker D; Vul E
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):230-5. PubMed ID: 24163333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Change in Evaluation Mode Can Cause a Cheerleader Effect.
    Messner C; Carnelli M; Höhener PS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():607448. PubMed ID: 33981266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dissociable influence of social context on judgements of facial attractiveness and trustworthiness.
    Carragher DJ; Thomas NA; Nicholls MER
    Br J Psychol; 2021 Nov; 112(4):902-933. PubMed ID: 33742452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ensemble statistics shape face adaptation and the cheerleader effect.
    Ying H; Burns E; Lin X; Xu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):421-436. PubMed ID: 30802125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "cheerleader effect" in facial and bodily attractiveness: A result of memory bias and not perceptual encoding.
    Hsieh JY; Gwinn OS; Brooks KR; Stephen ID; Carragher DJ; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):972-980. PubMed ID: 33174508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces?
    Guyader N; Chauvin A; Boucart M; Peyrin C
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():100-111. PubMed ID: 28202396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
    Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Friend effects framework: Contrastive and hierarchical processing in cheerleader effects.
    Burns EJ; Yang W; Ying H
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104715. PubMed ID: 33823426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cuing effects of faces are dependent on handedness and visual field.
    Ferneyhough E; Stanley DA; Phelps EA; Carrasco M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 20702873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The face evoked steady-state visual potentials are sensitive to the orientation, viewpoint, expression and configuration of the stimuli.
    Vakli P; Németh K; Zimmer M; Kovács G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):336-50. PubMed ID: 25455428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial attention does not modulate holistic face processing, even when multiple faces are present.
    Norman LJ; Tokarev A
    Perception; 2014; 43(12):1341-52. PubMed ID: 25669051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound location can influence audiovisual speech perception when spatial attention is manipulated.
    Tiippana K; Puharinen H; Möttönen R; Sams M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):67-90. PubMed ID: 21406157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial attention modulates early face processing.
    Feng W; Martinez A; Pitts M; Luo YJ; Hillyard SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3461-8. PubMed ID: 23017595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related differences in the distractor previewing effect with schematic faces of emotions.
    Wan X; Tian L; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(4):386-410. PubMed ID: 23957762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biases in spatial bisection induced by viewing male and female faces.
    Cattaneo Z; Schiavi S; Lega C; Renzi C; Tagliaferri M; Boehringer J; Carbon CC; Vecchi T
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(5):368-77. PubMed ID: 24614871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Face inversion reveals holistic processing of peripheral faces.
    Kovács P; Knakker B; Hermann P; Kovács G; Vidnyánszky Z
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():81-95. PubMed ID: 29096198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute stress influences the discrimination of complex scenes and complex faces in young healthy men.
    Paul M; Lech RK; Scheil J; Dierolf AM; Suchan B; Wolf OT
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2016 Apr; 66():125-9. PubMed ID: 26803527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect.
    Laguesse R; Dormal G; Biervoye A; Kuefner D; Rossion B
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):14. PubMed ID: 23019119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.