These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29416517)

  • 1. Extending Situated Language Comprehension (Accounts) with Speaker and Comprehender Characteristics: Toward Socially Situated Interpretation.
    Münster K; Knoeferle P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2267. PubMed ID: 29416517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integration of Social Context vs. Linguistic Reference During Situated Language Processing.
    Maquate K; Knoeferle P
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():547360. PubMed ID: 34408686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects.
    Rodriguez Ronderos C; Münster K; Guerra E; Kreysa H; Rodríguez A; Kröger J; Kluth T; Burigo M; Abashidze D; Nunnemann E; Knoeferle P
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Nov; (141):. PubMed ID: 30582604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Situated sentence processing: the coordinated interplay account and a neurobehavioral model.
    Crocker MW; Knoeferle P; Mayberry MR
    Brain Lang; 2010 Mar; 112(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 19450874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.
    Rohde H; Futrell R; Lucas CG
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104491. PubMed ID: 33545512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural integration of speaker and message.
    Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct effects of different visual cues on sentence comprehension and later recall: The case of speaker gaze versus depicted actions.
    Kreysa H; Nunnemann EM; Knoeferle P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():220-229. PubMed ID: 29858107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Referential vs. Non-referential World-Language Relations: How Do They Modulate Language Comprehension in 4 to 5-Year-Olds, Younger, and Older Adults?
    Maquate K; Knoeferle P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():542091. PubMed ID: 33519572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture.
    Holler J; Schubotz L; Kelly S; Hagoort P; Schuetze M; Özyürek A
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 25255036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Speaker Gaze Modulate Syntactic Structuring and Thematic Role Assignment during Spoken Sentence Comprehension?
    Knoeferle P; Kreysa H
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():538. PubMed ID: 23227018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
    Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
    Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the same wavelength: predictable language enhances speaker-listener brain-to-brain synchrony in posterior superior temporal gyrus.
    Dikker S; Silbert LJ; Hasson U; Zevin JD
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(18):6267-72. PubMed ID: 24790197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental sociolinguistics: Children's acquisition of language variation.
    Johnson EK; White KS
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2020 Jan; 11(1):e1515. PubMed ID: 31454182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an FMRI study.
    Tesink CM; Petersson KM; van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Buitelaar JK; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2085-99. PubMed ID: 19016606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.
    Traxler MJ
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Nov; 18(11):605-11. PubMed ID: 25200381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
    Pickering MJ; Gambi C
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Oct; 144(10):1002-1044. PubMed ID: 29952584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scalar Implicature is Sensitive to Contextual Alternatives.
    Zhang Z; Bergen L; Paunov A; Ryskin R; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13238. PubMed ID: 36739521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.