177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29416948)
1. Fit for Duty?: Evaluating the Physical Fitness Requirements of Battlefield Airmen.
Sean R; Maria C L; Carra S S; Stephanie P; Thomas M; Amanda A; Therese B; Abigail H
Rand Health Q; 2018 Jan; 7(2):8. PubMed ID: 29416948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating an Operator Physical Fitness Test Prototype for Tactical Air Control Party and Air Liaison Officers: A Preliminary Analysis of Test Implementation.
Robson S; Krueger TC; Cerully JL; Pezard S; Raaen L; Beyene NM
Rand Health Q; 2019 May; 8(3):7. PubMed ID: 31205807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Strength Aptitude Test and Other Fitness Tests to Qualify Air Force Recruits for Physically Demanding Specialties.
Robson S; Pezard S; Lytell MC; Sims CS; Boon JE; Etchegaray JM; Robbins M; Schulker D; Sollinger JM; Campbell JH; Atler A; Seabrook SB; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Volpe EK; Linnenkohl KA
Rand Health Q; 2019 May; 8(3):8. PubMed ID: 31205808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.
Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S101-6. PubMed ID: 26506171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. Army physical demands study: Identification and validation of the physically demanding tasks of combat arms occupations.
Sharp MA; Cohen BS; Boye MW; Foulis SA; Redmond JE; Larcom K; Hydren JR; Gebhardt DL; Canino MC; Warr BJ; Zambraski EJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S62-S67. PubMed ID: 29054747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced physical and cognitive performance in active duty Airmen: evidence from a randomized multimodal physical fitness and nutritional intervention.
Zwilling CE; Strang A; Anderson E; Jurcsisn J; Johnson E; Das T; Kuchan MJ; Barbey AK
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17826. PubMed ID: 33077817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. Army physical demands study: Prevalence and frequency of performing physically demanding tasks in deployed and non-deployed settings.
Boye MW; Cohen BS; Sharp MA; Canino MC; Foulis SA; Larcom K; Smith L
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S57-S61. PubMed ID: 28928023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.
Nindl BC; Alvar BA; R Dudley J; Favre MW; Martin GJ; Sharp MA; Warr BJ; Stephenson MD; Kraemer WJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S216-20. PubMed ID: 26506191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association of Sickle Cell Trait on Career and Operational Outcomes in the United States Air Force.
Ebert EP; Escobar JD; Costello AA; Webber BJ
Mil Med; 2023 Jan; 188(1-2):e214-e219. PubMed ID: 34117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Use of Fitness Testing to Predict Occupational Performance in Tactical Personnel: A Critical Review.
Orr R; Sakurai T; Scott J; Movshovich J; Dawes JJ; Lockie R; Schram B
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34299926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Differences in Physical Fitness and Occupational Task Performance Between Trainees and Active Duty Soldiers.
Canino MC; Foulis SA; Zambraski EJ; Cohen BS; Redmond JE; Hauret KG; Frykman PN; Sharp MA
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 29952870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical Employment Standards for UK Royal Navy Personnel: A Survey of Tasks That Require Muscle Strength and Endurance.
Brown PEH; Fallowfield JL
Mil Med; 2019 Dec; 184(11-12):882-888. PubMed ID: 31067314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical Fitness Predictors of a Warrior Task Simulation Test.
Huang HC; Nagai T; Lovalekar M; Connaboy C; Nindl BC
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Sep; 32(9):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 30137030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fitness tests and occupational tasks of military interest: a systematic review of correlations.
Hauschild VD; DeGroot DW; Hall SM; Grier TL; Deaver KD; Hauret KG; Jones BH
Occup Environ Med; 2017 Feb; 74(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 27810940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating occupational medicine methodology into military fitness for duty and readiness issues.
Popper SE
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Aug; 68(8):740-5. PubMed ID: 9262819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Illness and injury risk and healthcare utilization, United States Air Force battlefield airmen and security forces, 2000-2005.
Warha D; Webb T; Wells T
Mil Med; 2009 Sep; 174(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 19780363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical and Psychological Predictors of Failure in the Air Force Physical Fitness Test.
Turner J; Wagner T; Langhals B
Sports (Basel); 2022 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 35447864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operational stressors on physical performance in special operators and countermeasures to improve performance: a review of the literature.
O'Hara R; Henry A; Serres J; Russell D; Locke R
J Spec Oper Med; 2014; 14(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 24604441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.
Jameson J; Pappa L; McGuire B; Kelly KR
US Army Med Dep J; 2015; ():12-21. PubMed ID: 26159007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body mass index predicts selected physical fitness attributes but is not associated with performance on military relevant tasks in U.S. Army Soldiers.
Pierce JR; DeGroot DW; Grier TL; Hauret KG; Nindl BC; East WB; McGurk MS; Jones BH
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S79-S84. PubMed ID: 28919497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
