These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29416948)
21. Vision readiness in Operation Restore Hope. Buckingham RS; Whitwell K; Cornforth L; Lee RB Mil Med; 2002 Jul; 167(7):532-6. PubMed ID: 12125842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preemployment physical evaluation. Jackson AS Exerc Sport Sci Rev; 1994; 22():53-90. PubMed ID: 7925553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improving readiness and fitness of the active military force through occupational medicine tenets. Popper SE; Yourkavitch MS; Schwarz BW; Wolfe MW; McDaniels M; Hankins ST; Curtis TE J Occup Environ Med; 1999 Dec; 41(12):1065-71. PubMed ID: 10609226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Force plate vertical jump scans are not a valid proxy for physical fitness in US special warfare trainees. Scott WC; Hando BR; Butler CR; Mata JD; Bryant JF; Angadi SS Front Physiol; 2022; 13():966970. PubMed ID: 36467678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations. Nindl BC; Jones BH; Van Arsdale SJ; Kelly K; Kraemer WJ Mil Med; 2016 Jan; 181(1 Suppl):50-62. PubMed ID: 26741902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A social-ecological examination of sleep among Airmen in technical training. Ellis JM; Estevez Burns RA; Blue Star JA; Patience MA; Brown LN; Ruggieri J; Joiner AV; Little MA; Talcott WG Mil Psychol; 2024 May; 36(3):311-322. PubMed ID: 38661470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical employment standards, physical training and musculoskeletal injury in physically demanding occupations. Drain JR; Reilly TJ Work; 2019; 63(4):495-508. PubMed ID: 31282465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards. Roberts D; Gebhardt DL; Gaskill SE; Roy TC; Sharp MA Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2016 Jun; 41(6 Suppl 2):S108-20. PubMed ID: 27277561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ability of fitness testing to predict injury risk during initial tactical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tomes CD; Sawyer S; Orr R; Schram B Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 31371384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. U.S. Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers. Foulis SA; Sharp MA; Redmond JE; Frykman PN; Warr BJ; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Canino MC; Zambraski EJ J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Nov; 20 Suppl 4():S74-S78. PubMed ID: 28823473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Physical fitness and occupational performance of women in the u.s. Army. Sharp MA Work; 1994; 4(2):80-92. PubMed ID: 24440881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Physical Fitness Standards to Support Readiness and Deployability: An Examination of Department of the Air Force Policies and Culture. Matthews M; Sims CS; Robson S; Walsh M; Rennane S; Snoke J Rand Health Q; 2022 Nov; 10(1):10. PubMed ID: 36484080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Occupational demand and human rights. Public safety officers and cardiorespiratory fitness. Shephard RJ Sports Med; 1991 Aug; 12(2):94-109. PubMed ID: 1947536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Physiological Readiness and Resilience: Pillars of Military Preparedness. Szivak TK; Kraemer WJ J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Nov; 29 Suppl 11():S34-9. PubMed ID: 26506195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Establishing a physical criterion for assigning personnel to U.S. Air Force jobs. Ayoub MM; Jiang BC; Smith JL; Selan JL; McDaniel JW Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 May; 48(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 3591669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Revalidating U.S. Army soldiers' perceptions of combat arms job tasks: Frequencies, importance and expectations of performance. Boye MW; Cohen BS; Canino MC; Foulis SA; Sharp MA Work; 2021; 70(3):997-1007. PubMed ID: 34744046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Body Composition Metrics for United States Air Force Airmen. Griffith JR; White ED; Fass RD; Lucas BM Mil Med; 2018 Mar; 183(3-4):e201-e207. PubMed ID: 29365181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Wingman-Connect Program increases social integration for Air Force personnel at elevated suicide risk: Social network analysis of a cluster RCT. Wyman PA; Pickering TA; Pisani AR; Cero I; Yates B; Schmeelk-Cone K; Hendricks Brown C; Gibbons RD; Simonson J; Pflanz SE Soc Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 296():114737. PubMed ID: 35131614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]