524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29417251)
1. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound by radiologists using Computer Aided Detection.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Platel B; de Jong M; Steenbakkers A; Mourits M; Grivegnee A; Borelli C; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():54-59. PubMed ID: 28267549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
Jiang Y; Inciardi MF; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 29792747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts.
Drukker K; Horsch KJ; Pesce LL; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 23601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance and Reading Time of Automated Breast US with or without Computer-aided Detection.
Yang S; Gao X; Liu L; Shu R; Yan J; Zhang G; Xiao Y; Ju Y; Zhao N; Song H
Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):540-549. PubMed ID: 31210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of radiologists' findings by computer-aided detection (CAD) software in breast cancer detection with automated 3D breast ultrasound: a concept study in implementation of artificial intelligence software.
van Zelst JC; Tan T; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Acta Radiol; 2020 Mar; 61(3):312-320. PubMed ID: 31324132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
