524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29417251)
21. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts.
Philadelpho F; Calas MJG; Carneiro GAC; Silveira IC; Vaz ABR; Nogueira AMC; Bergmann A; Lopes FPPL
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 43(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 33860502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.
Kim SH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 31920025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts.
Drukker K; Sennett CA; Giger ML
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):012901. PubMed ID: 24387528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study.
Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the effect of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant lesions on reader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.
Tan T; Platel B; Twellmann T; van Schie G; Mus R; Grivegnée A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1381-8. PubMed ID: 24119350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Lesion Classification on Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Radiologists Without Breast Ultrasound Expertise.
He P; Chen W; Bai MY; Li J; Wang QQ; Fan LH; Zheng J; Liu CT; Zhang XR; Yuan XR; Song PJ; Cui LG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Oct; 221(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 37222275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in breast ultrasound according to the radiologist's experience.
Chabi ML; Borget I; Ardiles R; Aboud G; Boussouar S; Vilar V; Dromain C; Balleyguier C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 22310523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lesion Segmentation in Automated 3D Breast Ultrasound: Volumetric Analysis.
Agarwal R; Diaz O; Lladó X; Gubern-Mérida A; Vilanova JC; Martí R
Ultrason Imaging; 2018 Mar; 40(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 29182056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study.
Wei Q; Yan YJ; Wu GG; Ye XR; Jiang F; Liu J; Wang G; Wang Y; Song J; Pan ZP; Hu JH; Jin CY; Wang X; Dietrich CF; Cui XW
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4046-4055. PubMed ID: 35066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 23116728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
