These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29417251)

  • 41. Value of automated breast ultrasound in screening: Standalone and as a supplemental to digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Aribal E; Seker ME; Guldogan N; Yilmaz E
    Int J Cancer; 2024 Oct; 155(8):1466-1475. PubMed ID: 38989802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of the effect of computer aided diagnosis system on breast ultrasound for inexperienced radiologists in describing and determining breast lesions.
    Lee J; Kim S; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Park GE
    Med Ultrason; 2019 Aug; 21(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 31476202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Breast cancer detection in automated 3D breast ultrasound using iso-contours and cascaded RUSBoosts.
    Kozegar E; Soryani M; Behnam H; Salamati M; Tan T
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Aug; 79():68-80. PubMed ID: 28448836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Screening Outcomes of Mammography with AI in Dense Breasts: A Comparative Study with Supplemental Screening US.
    Ha SM; Jang MJ; Youn I; Yoen H; Ji H; Lee SH; Yi A; Chang JM
    Radiology; 2024 Jul; 312(1):e233391. PubMed ID: 39041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computer-aided detection of breast cancers using Haar-like features in automated 3D breast ultrasound.
    Tan T; Mordang JJ; van Zelst J; Grivegnée A; Gubern-Mérida A; Melendez J; Mann RM; Zhang W; Platel B; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1498-504. PubMed ID: 25832040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multi-modal artificial intelligence for the combination of automated 3D breast ultrasound and mammograms in a population of women with predominantly dense breasts.
    Tan T; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Zhang T; Xu L; Beets-Tan RGH; Shen Y; Karssemeijer N; Xu J; Mann RM; Bao L
    Insights Imaging; 2023 Jan; 14(1):10. PubMed ID: 36645507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners.
    Maier A; Heil J; Lauer A; Harcos A; Schaefgen B; von Au A; Spratte J; Riedel F; Rauch G; Hennigs A; Domschke C; Schott S; Rom J; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):571-582. PubMed ID: 28748340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort].
    Prosch H; Halbwachs C; Strobl C; Reisner LM; Hondl M; Weber M; Mostbeck GH
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21630181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts.
    Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK
    Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
    Svahn TM; Macaskill P; Houssami N
    Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Pinto MC; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Pedersen K; Hofvind S; Wicklein J; Kappler S; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):529-536. PubMed ID: 34227882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; DeMartini WB; Hylton NM; Herman B; Schnall MD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W683-9. PubMed ID: 23701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions.
    Zhang J; Cai L; Chen L; Pang X; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Oct; 21(1):156. PubMed ID: 34702200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Computer-aided lesion diagnosis in automated 3-D breast ultrasound using coronal spiculation.
    Tan T; Platel B; Huisman H; Sánchez CI; Mus R; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 May; 31(5):1034-42. PubMed ID: 22271831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.