These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29417552)
1. Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score -15: a multicentre, cohort study. Lyckner S; Böregård IL; Zetterlund EL; Chew MS Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2018 Aug; 62(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 29417552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION. Miklić Bublić M; Miklić P; Barl P; Matas M; Sekulić A Acta Clin Croat; 2021 Jun; 60(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34744273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Bergestuen L; Moger T; Oterhals K; Pfeffer F; Nestvold T; Norderval S; Nymo LS; Havnes K; Lassen K; Breivik K Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2024 Jan; 68(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 37682626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15). Kara U; Şimşek F; Kamburoğlu H; Özhan MÖ; Alakuş Ü; İnce ME; Eksert S; Özkan G; Eşkin MB; Şenkal S Turk J Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 52(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 36161615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hindi translation and cultural adaptation of the quality of recovery score-40 (QoR-40 score): A validation study. Govil N; Rathore R; Tiwari A; Garg PK; Parag K; Mishra P Indian J Anaesth; 2024 Jun; 68(6):533-539. PubMed ID: 38903262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study. Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale. de Vlieger JCN; Luiting WH; Lockyer J; Meyer P; Fleer J; Sanderman R; Wietasch JKG BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):243. PubMed ID: 35915438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40. Tanaka Y; Wakita T; Fukuhara S; Nishiwada M; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21626452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire. Nakatani S; Ida M; Tanaka Y; Okamoto N; Wang X; Nakatani H; Sato M; Naito Y; Kawaguchi M J Anesth; 2021 Jun; 35(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 33763758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric evaluation of the modified quality of recovery score for the postanaesthesia care unit (QoR-PACU Kahl U; Boehm A; Krause L; Klinger R; Stoimenov K; Zöllner C; Plümer L; Fischer M Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2024 Jun; 43(3):101380. PubMed ID: 38499247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study. Kahl U; Brodersen K; Kaiser S; Krause L; Klinger R; Plümer L; Zöllner C; Fischer M PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289685. PubMed ID: 37582085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40). Vignaud M; Morel C; Henault A; Futier E; Pereira B; Lambert C; Beloeil H Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2021 Apr; 40(2):100822. PubMed ID: 33722740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. VALIDATION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY-40 QUESTIONNAIRE ADAPTED FOR CROATIAN POPULATION. Sulen N; Šimurina T; Milošević M; Župčić M; Mraović B Acta Clin Croat; 2023 Nov; 62(3):426-436. PubMed ID: 39310682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translation and Validation of a Wound-specific, Quality-of-life Instrument (The Wound-QoL) in a Swedish Population. Fagerdahl AM; Bergström G Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 May; 64(5):40-46. PubMed ID: 29847310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale. Bu XS; Zhang J; Zuo YX Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 26518201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Kleif J; Waage J; Christensen KB; Gögenur I Br J Anaesth; 2018 Jan; 120(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 29397134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Lee JH; Kim D; Seo D; Son JS; Kim DC Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Dec; 71(6):467-475. PubMed ID: 29684992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]